NURS 500 Response DF (Classmate #2): Introduction & Theoretical Knowledge Master of Science in Nursing concentration Family Nurse Practitioner BOOK NAME: Theoretical basis for nursing (5th ed.) https://ambassadored.vitalsource.com/#/user/signin READ: Theoretical basis for nursing (5th ed.) Chapter 1 (Pages 2-12) Chapter 2 (Pages 23-25) Nursing Theories (uploaded resource file) Science of Unitary Human Beings (uploaded file) APA Manual 6th edition (use for reference formatting) Do not use quotations in this discussion. Paraphrase your sources. Response Discussion Post Instructions: Respond to your classmate’s discussion post on Introduction and Theoretical Knowledge. My classmate was instructed to answer the following questions below in their discussion post: 1. (Your name) and description of your current job. 3. How do you see yourself applying knowledge from this course? 4. Post a photo of yourself Nursing researchers have argued that nurses are taught to value clinical skills over theoretical knowledge. With the focus on medical interventions, laboratory values, and nursing diagnoses, theory is often under-represented. This can cause nurses to react to nursing theory as having little or nothing to do with the profession of nursing. As you begin your graduate level nursing career, consider the following 1. Do you agree with this assessment? 2. Based on your prior experiences, how much has theory been integrated into your nursing education? 3. In your opinion, how might a greater theoretical awareness benefit your education at the graduate level? Be sure to supplement your discussion with your personal and professional experiences INCLUDE IN YOUR RESPONSE TO CLASSMATEs DISCUSSION POST: 1) A commonality between yourself and your peer, or something about them that you find interesting. In addition, post a response to the following: To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts: 1) Compare your response to the responses of your peers. How do your posts differ; how are they the same? 2) Discuss how your past educational experiences related to theory differed, if at all. 3) Contrast their opinions with your own. * Present new references that support your opinions. Support with at least 1 scholarly peer reviewed journal article to support your position is required. Peer reviewed journals must be LESS than 5 YEARS OLD, and from the UNITED STATES. (Your text book may be used as a source but does NOT count toward the 1 required references). References must be different from the references used in My Initial Discussion Post and Respond to this Post. I have uploaded a document labeled My Initial Discussion Post and Respond to this Post, so you can see the references used as well as the context. APA formatting applies and includes the following for your response post A) In text citations in APA format B) Reference list in APA format (include doi) Your response should be 250-300 words. In text citations do count in the word count, but references do not. Grading Rubric: Contribution of New Ideas 1. Contributed new information to the discussion by bringing in relevant ideas from outside course (prior knowledge). 2. Shared new perspective or analysis of ideas. 3. Substantive comments and questions that significantly helped to move the discussion forward. 4. One scholarly article in responding classmates essay are cited. Expression of Ideas; APA Style 1. Elaborated on ideas of classmate by sharing additional examples and adding further explanation 2. Discussion was expressed in a clear and respectful manner 3. APA style adhered to. No spelling or grammar errors; is within word limits, no quotations
Hide
