Satisfaction Guarantee

First time here?

usewelcome15 to get 15% off

Reliability and Validity

Login for writer: hidden, available for the assigned writer only
Password for writer: hidden, available for the assigned writer only

NURS 560 Response DF (Classmate #1): Reliability and Validity Master of Science in Nursing concentration Family Nurse Practitioner BOOK NAME: The practice of nursing research READ: – Reference Chapters: 8,10,11,12,15, 16 – Watch Video Reliability, Validity, and Trustworthiness – Watch Video Developing a Research Questions ttps:// – Watch Video Quantitative vs Qualitative Research – Watch Video Ontology, Epistemology, Methodology and Methods in Research Simplified! – Watch Video Understanding Descriptive and Inferential Statistics – Watch Video Anatomy of a Research Article – Watch Video Qualitative vs Quantitative – Watch Video Evidence-based Practice – What is qualitative research? (uploaded file) – PICO Concepts for Developing a Purpose Statement (uploaded file) – PICO Elements for a Purpose Statement and Evidence Search (uploaded file) Do not use quotations in this discussion. Paraphrase your sources. Response Discussion Post Instructions: Respond to your classmate’s discussion post on Evidence-based Practice. My classmate was instructed to answer the following questions below in their discussion post: TOPIC: You have watched the slide presentation on reliability, validity and trustworthiness in the unit videos. Consider this video and respond to the following questions: DIRECTIONS: 1) Describe the scientific rigor associated with quantitative and qualitative research and the importance of reliability, validity in quantitative research, and trustworthiness in qualitative research. 2) What are the differences among these concepts? 3) Discuss types of validity and reliability and the components of trustworthiness. 4) Provide some suggestions that will improve them when conducting quantitative and qualitative research studies. INCLUDE IN YOUR RESPONSE TO CLASSMATEs DISCUSSION POST: 1) Respond to classmates other postings with substantive comments. Substantive comments add to the discussion and provide your fellow students with information that will enhance the learning environment. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you arent just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature. 2) In responding to your colleagues postings offer alternative questions and rationales for your suggestions. (Please state an open ended question in your response discussion post for my c classmate to respond to) * Present new references that support your opinions. Support with at least 1 scholarly peer reviewed journal article to support your position is required. Peer reviewed journals must be LESS than 5 YEARS OLD, and from the UNITED STATES. (Your text book may be used as a source but does NOT count toward the 1 required references). References must be different from the references used in My Initial Discussion Post and Respond to this Post. I have uploaded a document labeled My Initial Discussion Post and Respond to this Post, so you can see the references used as well as the context. APA formatting applies and includes the following for your response post A) In text citations in APA format B) Reference list in APA format (include doi) Your response should be 250-300 words. In text citations do count in the word count, but references do not. Grading Rubric: Contribution of New Ideas 1. Contributed new information to the discussion by bringing in relevant ideas from outside course (prior knowledge). 2. Shared new perspective or analysis of ideas. 3. Substantive comments and questions that significantly helped to move the discussion forward. 4. One scholarly article in responding classmates essay are cited. Expression of Ideas; APA Style 1. Elaborated on ideas of classmate by sharing additional examples and adding further explanation 2. Discussion was expressed in a clear and respectful manner 3. APA style adhered to. No spelling or grammar errors; is within word limits, no quotations