Consider generally the concepts of an ordered and enchanted cosmos, in light of the specific ways that scholastic philosophers analyzed substance, motion, causality, and purpose in nature. Is this medieval vision of nature justified? How might someone argue against their worldview, and how might it be defended? Please make sure to explicate the arguments of at least two of the following thinkers in the course of unpacking your own thesis: Caldecott, Clayton, Chesterton, Feser, Aquinas, and Talbott.
