How has the first month of accounting ethics discussions changed your view of the profession? Does it change how you feel about working in such a field? This discussion can also reflect on other academic and personal viewpoints. Think of some decisions that you’ve made in the last month that were changed/enhanced by what we’ve talked about so far this semester.
Read the below article, “The Three Fundamental Leadership Traits that Support Enduring Organizations”: https://www.forbes.com/sites/louisefron/2015/05/11/the-three-fundamental-leadership-traits-that-support-enduring-organizations/#6a0f04494b7c/ Then: 1. Identify the correlation between trust, communication, and organizational culture during the CM process. 2. Outline the role of a) The leadership team and b) The HR department during the CM process. 3. Give one example of what constitutes “caring for” your employees at any step/stage of the process.
Compare and contrast the biographical approach Linda Colley employs in The Ordeal of Elizabeth Marsh with Charles Manns method of engaging history in 1491. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each author in addressing the historical period under consideration in their work? Which of the two works do you ultimately think is most successful in distilling the essence of the times with which it deals? I will comment on your paper according to the following rubric: 1. Have you included a position statement that clearly articulates which of the two works you think most successful? 2. In arriving at that position statement, have you discussed at length at least one point of comparison and one point of contrast? 3. Have you considered a total of at least two strengths and weaknesses for each author? 4. Is the paper clearly written and well-organized so that your position is comprehensible and supported by your discussion of the points of comparison/contrast as well as the strengths and weaknesses of each author.
Between 1600-2000 words overall including everything. One grade deducted for every 10 words under or over the word count range. Engineering is often associated with objective and concrete facts; however, more subjective issues are equally critical, most notably professional ethics. The 2019 HBO miniseries Chernobyl has recently called attention back to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, an engineering catastophy that cost many lives and could have been avoided had the engineers and politicians involved employed ethical standards. According to the Professional Engineers Act (1990), which has been adopted by the Professional Engineers of Ontario, there are five ethics that engineers must uphold (verbatim): fairness and loyalty to the practitioners associates, employers, clients, subordinates and employees; fidelity to public needs; devotion to high ideals of personal honour and professional integrity; knowledge of developments in the area of professional engineering relevant to any services that are undertaken; and competence in the performance of any professional engineering services that are undertaken. (p. 28) The goal of this essay is to determine whether applying an ethical code would have prevented the Chernobyl disaster. You will outline the context of the Chernobyl disaster. This includes establishing which engineering issues were involved and why the choices that eventually led to the disaster were made. This will require that you detail the potential motivations for and reasoning behind these decisions. You will then provide a similar summary/analysis to the Russian governments response to the disaster. You will then identify all the ethical issues involved. This can include the ethics outlined by Ontarios Professional Engineers Act (1990), or other ethical standards you identify as being relevant, such as nonmaleficence (causing no harm), veracity/honesty, and fairness. You might also refer to the ethics codes of other professional engineering bodies. The essay will have an emphasis on duty to public welfare, and specifically the duty to protect public safety. Through an analysis, you will determine whether adhering to a specific set of ethics would have prevented the disaster, and if so, which ethics should have been implemented.
Write an essay of 1000 words on one of the following topics. Your essay should make precise and detailed reference to the text. Make sure your views can be substantiated by various examples and illustration in the novel itself. The essay has to be written in MLA format and the secondary sources should be referenced. 1) “Lazaro must be seen either as a victim or as a deceiver; in the readers eyes, the narrator cannot be both at the same time, and yet both interpretations of the text are possible.” Give the detailed reason why you prefer either the “victim” or “deciever” interpretations. 2) Lazarillo de Tormes is a comic novel. Discuss the nature of the comic in the novel by considering the types of humor employed. Who gets the last laugh?
Guidelines for Critique of Qualitative Research1. Use the following guidelines to critique the research article provided. There is a distinct difference between critiquing and reporting. Make sure you critique and provide the analysis of “why” in your support. Refer to Chapter 18 for specific critiquing questions. Guidelines adapted from: Gray, J.R., Grove, S.K., & Sutherland, S. (2017). The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (8th ed.). St Louis, MO: Elsevier, Inc.2. Prepare your paper using APA format 6th edition.3. No abstract is required.4. Page length should be no more than 4 pages, excluding title and reference pages.5. This is a formal paper. Follow closely the Grading Rubric for Written Assignment found in the Course Resources section of the course. Be sure to include an Introduction and Conclusion to the assignment.TITLE (3 points)Does the title represent the focus of the study?Abstract (3 points)Does the abstract summarize the purpose of the study, qualitative approach, sample and key findings?Research Problem (5 Points)What is the phenomenon of interest? Is it explicit? Significance to the researcher noted? To nursing?Purpose and Research Questions (5 points)Clearly stated? Logical approach to addressing the research problem of the study? Addresses population as connected to identified problem?Are there explicit questions? Are they consistent with the framework, problem, and purpose? Is a qualitative method appropriate to answer the research questions?Literature Review (4 points)References current? Reviews previous studies and theories? Critically appraises and synthesizes the studies? Summarizes what is known and not known?Philosophical Foundation/Theoretical Perspective (5 points)Philosophical theory and perspective described? Primary source cited for the philosophical foundation/theory? Broad philosophy used? If so was a specific philosopher identified?Research Design (5 points)Is the design appropriate based on the qualitative method chosen? What is that stated or implied research approach? Describe the qualitative research perspective and state if the researcher was true to the design? Is the research question asked, appropriate for the methodology? (Gray, Grove & Sutherland, 2017, Chapter 4 may be helpful in reviewing different qualitative research methodologies).Sample and Setting (5 points)What sampling method was used? Is it appropriate for the type of study? Was the sample described? How were participants selected and recruited? What was the site(s) for participant selection? Was the inclusion and exclusion criteria for participant selection described? Was the sample size sufficient and how was it determined? Was data saturation described? What was the role of the researcher in the sampling process?Data Collection (20 points)What was the data collection process? Discuss the period of time for the interviews and data collection period? Describe the data collection process (individual interviews or focus groups)? Was the research study conducted in a consistent manner or if changes were made were they described?Was protection of human subjects addressed? Did an Institutional Review Board approve the study by approving the research process, protection of human subjects and outcome? Did the researcher provide information on potential risk and benefits?Ethical: Where there any adverse events and were they managed well? Did the researcher acknowledge potential participant vulnerability and or sensitivity? What type the thematic analysis process for coding data based on the design methodology?Data Analysis and Methodological Congruence (20 points)Discuss rigor and threats to the qualitative process (Make sure to address all aspects of rigor evaluation)? Did the researcher maintain ethical rigor? Discuss ethical implications related to the study? Was there a decision trail or auditability?Analytical PrecisenessWhat type the thematic analysis process for coding data based on the design methodology? Are the study themes logical and correspond with findings? Was there member checking (expert in field) applied to the study?Theoretical ConnectednessAre the themes and concepts clearly described, logical, interconnected and reflective of the study population? Are the concepts and themes congruent with the phenomena?Heuristic RelevanceCan the reader recognize the phenomenon described in the study and its theoretical significance?DISCUSSIONInterpretation and Implications for Future Research (6 points)Was a theory produced? Were findings linked to the framework? Were implications for nursing practice, education, theory development, research or nursing science addressed? Were suggestions made for future research?EVALUATION (4 Points)Summarize strengths and weaknesses of the studyExplain how the study contributes to nursing knowledge APA, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, CONSTRUCTIVE WRITING (15 points)Graduate level writing should be concise, clear, and organized. Content should flow from paragraph to paragraph using proper transitions. Correct use of grammar, spelling, and punctuation will assist in this process. All graduate papers must be written using the APA 6th edition. Please refer to the APA Manual 6th edition when completing this assignment.Grove and Burns and the article are the only 2 references you need.
Whom did you interview for the population health paper? Describe their role in terms of the health education topic chosen. What did they describe as challenges to their role? Outline your discussion with them. What did you find most helpful?
international students pursuing higher education in the United States it is will my topic I want to: First: The sources you choose for the annotated bibliography should be sources you will use in your research paper for the course. If you’re going to do all the work that an annotated bibliography entails, why not make it count! The assignment requires a minimum of ten annotated sources from the last five years. As you begin to do initial research, start to develop a potential research question from which your argument will ultimately come. For the purposes of the annotated bibliography, it will be best if the sources you find are used to support a single argument or thesis statement. You also want to include a variety of sources, i.e. books, reference sources, and peer-reviewed and published journal articles. Use the resources available here and others available from the library web site to locate your sources. Each entry of the annotated bibliography should include the full bibliographic information about the work according to APA (6th edition). Each annotation should: summarize the main points and/or arguments, speak to the relevance of the source to your paper (ex. how will you use this source to counter or support yours or another source’s argument?), evaluate the credibility of the source (how do you know it’s credible?), and finally provide a brief explanation of how/where you found the source. Annotations are meant to be helpful for the writer/researcher; the information included in an annotation should be information that will be helpful to the writer/researcher as he/she begins the process of composing and integrating sources into the paper. Please note that APA requires the word "References" centered at the top of the page. Also, the actual annotations should begin on the line beneath each citation on the list aligned with the hanging indent. No extra spaces should be between the citation and the annotation; the entire document should be double-spaced. Because the sources that will compose your annotated bibliography will be tied to your paper, include your working paper premise or argument at the top of the first page of the annotated bibliography. Creating an annotated bibliography calls for the application of a variety of intellectual skills: concise exposition, succinct analysis, and informed library research. First, research, locate and record citations to books, periodicals, and documents that may contain useful information and ideas on your selected topic. Examine and review the actual items. Then choose ten (10) references that provide a variety of perspectives on your selected topic. Cite the book, article, or document using APA 6th Edition. Use only recent research from last 5 years. Write a concise annotation that summarizes the central theme and scope of the book or article. Include one or more sentences that (a) evaluate the authority or background of the author, (b) comment on the intended audience, (c) compare or contrast this work with another you have cited, or (d) explain how this reference illuminates your selected topic. You must additionally include in the annotation why and/or how the reference is significant and/or has an impact on your selected topic. The purpose of the annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited to the selected topic. NOTE: This assignment is annotated bibliography and not abstract bibliography. Additionally, refer to hand out. Abstracts are the purely descriptive summaries often found at the beginning of scholarly journal articles or in periodical indexes. Annotations are descriptive and critical; they expose the author’s point of view, clarity and appropriateness of expression, and authority. Second: This assignment is designed to enable you to begin exploring a topic of interest within the area of leadership for possible future dissertation research. You are to determine/select a topic area for the research interest paper. Within the broad topic area, you will narrow the focus for this assignment. A review of literature related to the focused topic area will be conducted. This paper should reflect critical thinking to include (but not limited to) analysis, synthesis and evaluation. Use APA 6th Edition. Additionally, the paper must include the ten (10) required annotated bibliography references. A helpful hints: Do 10 minute free writes on the following questions (remember no judging of what you are writing, keep the pen of keep typing!). What are three or four things that you are curious about related to educational leadership and practice? What are three or four concerns you have about being an educational leader and committed educator? What three or four problems are dissatisfactions you have or foresee, with your commitment to effective school leadership? Next, look at what you havelook at the possible 12 things you have listed. What larger issues come to mind? Can you find an issue related to each curiosity, concern, and problem? Take one issue that holds promise as a research topic, and do another free write about it. Focus on your thoughts, experiences, and questions related to the possible topic. Take the issue you wrote about in your last free write, and turn it into a statement of the problem you tentatively will investigate. Then pose a question, or two or three, that go to the heart of what you think is the problem. Biases and Assumptions In qualitative research the researcher is the instrument for data collection (rather than a questionnaire or test, as in a qualitative study). If you are interviewing, you choose what questions to ask and in what order. If you are observing, you choose what and when to observe. Therefore, it I important to know what values, assumptions, beliefs, or biases you bring to the research/study. Researchers need to reflect on their own values, etc., and monitor them as they progress through the research/study (reflective journaling, peer debriefing) to determine their impact on the data and interpretations. It is, therefore, essential that you gain clarity about preconceptions. This helps you to investigate your question from a fresh and open viewpoint without prejudgment or imposing meaning too soon. This process is an ongoing analytical process rather than a fixed event (as our biases and assumptions can change). Take some time to reflect deeply on your biases and assumptions relative to your research. The paper should be at least 12 pages in length, excluding the Title Page and Reference section of the paper. Additionally the paper should include the required ten (10) annotated bibliographic references. The research interest paper should generally follow the proposed outline below: Title Page Introduction Abstract Opening Topic Context Significance Organization of the Paper Body Literature Review Conclusion Summation Analysis Implications References Use APA, 6th edition.
Hide
These are the exact instructions.. this essay is a strictly information based , put your research into the cultural aspects of the country .Five paragraph paper, strong thesis statement in the introduction., three more paragraphs and then the conclusion., each paragraph about a different aspect of the countries cultural norm..
You are an Athenian citizen who is providing legal advice to the defendant being prosecuted at court. Based on the forensic speech that you have selected, what primary legal strategy should the defendant pursue to obtain an acquittal? REQUIREMENTS: -Strong thesis introduced in your first paragraph -Arguments in support of your thesis organized into three or four distinct and coherent sections. -Explicit references to material from the speeches (with precise citations). These should be frequent and substantive. Your paper should express a close reading and engagement with the written content. -Close consideration of the grading rubric at the end of the courses syllabus. Please read, consider, and follow carefully. If you have questions, please consult me or your TA. -The substantive integration of three laws, legal precedents, or legal arguments of your choice that support your case. For these you should draw the following: *Primary source materials assigned for the course, especially Against Timarchus -You are required to derive 1 law, legal precedent, or argument from Against Timarchus *Primary source materials from these Binghamton University library resources (available as e-books): -Ilias Arnauotoglou, Ancient Greek Laws: A Sourcebook (London: Routledge, 1998) (Available as an e-book through the library) David D. Phillips, The Law of Ancient Athens (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2013 (Available as an e-book through the library) CITATIONS: for this assignment, follow the following parenthetical format: (Against Neaera, 12; Against Leocrates 3; Demosthenes 20, 157-58 in Law of Ancient Athens, p. 73).
Hide
