Writing Help

N.B. As preparation for this assignment, consider completing Assessment Tool 4-5: The communication diagnostic on Page 108 from your perspective and, if possible, those of other stakeholders or groups within your selected organization a) 20 points ( 4 points per stakeholder or group) Use Assessment Tool 4-2: Audience assessment template on Pg. 97 for the workplace/organization/association you selected in your previous Journal and Reflection papers. Select 5 stakeholders or groups and complete all seven columns for each. Present your results in chart form as a first step toward building your Communication Plan. b) 50 points (5 points per communication/action) Use Assessment Tool 4-4:: Communication plan template on Pg. 101 for the workplace/organization/association you selected in a) above. Select five key messages to communicate to five key audiences (i.e. the five stakeholders or groups you identified in a) ) and complete the first five columns only (Communication/action – Channel), ensuring you select a channel appropriate for reaching each audience effectively. Present your results either in chart or paragraph form. c) Reflection (30 points): [2 Pages] Describe how the assignments and activities have affected your view of the role of HR in the CM process in your selected organization. Use examples from your personal experience and independent research, citing your sources appropriately in APA citation style. Ensure you cite minimum one of our two textbooks and minimum one independent research source.
Hide

Write a final paper that examines The Gilded Six Bits through the lenses of Psychoanalytical and Reader-Response Theory. Project instructions attached with feedback and previous submissions for input.

1) Chapter 12 discusses various reasons for the historical growth in the size of benefits packages. Address these questions: Which of these reasons still affects the growth of employee benefits today? Which actually might be current reasons for declines in the size of benefit packages? 2) Describe how a benefits program might increase worker attraction, retention, and motivation. Which feature of a benefits program might be more attractive to you now, and why? Which feature of a benefits program would be least attractive to you now, and why? Are your views about the most and least attractive features of a benefits program likely to change over time, and why? 3) As HR director at Crangle Fixtures, your bonus this year is based on your ability to cut employee benefit costs. Your boss has said it’s okay to shift some of the costs over to employees (right now they pay nothing for their benefits), but that he doesn’t want you to overdo it. In other words, at least one-half of your suggestions should not hurt the employee’s pocket book. What alternatives do you want to explore and why?
Hide

Article Review Compare and contrast essay on Iran flexes proxy muscle in escalation involving Israel with 2 short articles that have different views. arrive at your own conclusion. Sources Acceptable: Think Tank articles, Periodicals/Magazines, Newspaper Op-eds, Commentaries Not Acceptable: Blogs, Social Media Postings –Argumentative and analytical essay. Sample Procedure Step 1: Choose two articles online (preferably with contrasting views) >> Identify a local and a regional or international source on a topic of your choosing e.g.) Government-run Newspaper (Global New Light of Myanmar) and a regional (Asia Times) or an international source (New York Times) Sample Procedure (cont) Step 2: Analyze and flesh out your argument (thesis statement) What to comment on: Language/tone (Framing/major themes), the contrasting perspectives (what do they discuss?), Identify similarities and differences What NOT to do: summary of events (at most a short, one-paragraph synopsis in the introduction would be sufficient) Sample thesis statement (argument): The ongoing Rohingya refugee crisis is centered on religious, sociopolitical and economic contentions. While the government-run newspaper focuses on X, international sources highlight Y. Structure of Essay Step 3: Create an outline of your essay: INTRODUCTION Introduction: A brief synopsis of current events, Aims and objectives, Argument, Outline (Scope of analysis) In this essay, I argue that . This paper aims toThe first section of this essay examines Structure of Essay (Cont) Step 4: Create an outline of your essay: BODY PARAGRAPHS Structuring the Body paragraphs: A: Point-by-Point* OR B: Similarities to differences (Compare and Contrast)* Structure of Essay (Cont) Step 5: Create an outline of your essay: CONCLUSION Conclusion: Summarizing and restating your thesis (core argument) To conclude In conclusion,. General Suggestions Academic Tone (no colloquial language) No contractions (shouldnt should not) Avoid Unsubstantiated Claims Formatting (MLA, APA, Harvard or Chicago) Analytical & argumentative, not descriptive Do not provide a summary of the articles (except for a brief synopsis in the Intro.) Introduce thesis statement (argument) in the first paragraph Keep headings to a minimum attach references
Hide

The purpose of an article review is to provide the academic community with a description, summary, and evaluation of the completed work. For the article review, students will assume the role of an expert who is critically evaluating contemporary research in the field of psychology. Students will incorporate material from across the course, analyzing and applying theories and principles of psychology, into a cohesive and well-written article review. This learning activity will facilitate the development of research skills, critical thinking, and writing skills that are necessary to success in the field of psychology. The article for review was chosen in Week Two of the course and must be used in this review. Carefully read the selected article, and then write the Article Review. Begin with a well-written introduction to the article that: Analyzes the article and identifies the professional area of psychology it represents Assesses the roles of psychology professionals within this area and describes whether or not the article clearly and correctly represents these roles. Evaluate the theoretical perspective on which the study is based Detail the hypotheses presented in the study or the relationship of interest Describe the sample(s) presented in the study (how participants were obtained, selected, sample size, etc.) Discuss where the study was conducted: university setting (lab), organization (field), etc. Examine the ethical concerns in the study using the APA Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct as a guide. Summarize the results of the study. Be certain to specify the findings and whether or not the hypotheses were supported. Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the study (usually found in the discussion section of the article). Evaluate possible contemporary applications of the results within the article Create a conclusion that includes a synopsis of professional insights about the study. In the creation of the Article Review, it is paramount to include information in the form of peer-reviewed research to support any statements made. A minimum of five peer-reviewed articles, not including the article chosen for this assignment, are required for this paper. The Final Paper: Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a title page with the following: Title of paper Students name Course name and number Instructors name Date submitted Must begin with an introductory paragraph that includes an analysis of the article and identification of the professional area of psychology it represents, as well as an assessment of the clear description of the roles of psychology professionals within the area presented. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. Must end with a conclusion that includes a synopsis of professional insights about the study. Must use at least five peer-reviewed sources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford University Library. The article being reviewed will not count toward this total. Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Hide

Please choose one of the topics listed below. Then write a response that contains your explanations of the ideas in the readings in your own words (70%) and a critically analysis and discussion of a key idea or claim expressed in the readings (30%). Your total response should be double-spaced and a minimum of 800 words. Your critical analysis section should be a minimum of 250 words. In the critical analysis section, do not hesitate to say what you think and the reasoning behind your point of view. Your Midterm can be submitted on Blackboard (strongly preferred) or sent to me as an attachment. I will read rough drafts any time between October 4 and October 6 at 6pm. Deadline: This assignment is due before 11:30pm, October 13. 1. Ancient Asian and Greek Philosophy Using the ideas in the Soccio text, describe and explain (&0%): ~what a philosophical archetype is; ~the Confucian ideal of the junzi (chun-tzu); ~at least two characteristics of the Dao; ~at least two main ideas in Democritus theory of atoms; ~at least two central ideas in Protagoras philosophy; Critically analyze and evaluate (30%) Platos claim that we can access and know a transcendent world of Forms. 2. Ancient Asian and Greek Philosophy Using the ideas in the Soccio text, describe and explain (70%): ~what a philosophical archetype is; ~what Confucius means by Chung-yung; ~the Daoist concept of Wu-wei; ~at least two ideas in Heraclitus philosophy; ~the concept of Socratic ignorance; Critically analyze and evaluate (30%) Platos claim that the visible world is not really real.
Hide

How Margaret Sanger and Wonder Woman show perserverance and over come adversities.

Overview In this assignment, using literature of your choice on traditional models of leadership and literature from this unit on relational models of leadership, you will reflect on your propensities to take endogenic and exogenic perspectives within organizational life. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies: Analyze models of relational leadership. Evaluate leader behavior and practice in an inclusionary leadership model. Evaluate barriers and facilitators to inclusionary leadership practice. Apply inclusionary leadership theories and models to personal practice. Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the business professions. Preparation After completing the assigned course readings, reflect on your experiences of leaders whose actions were either authoritarian or inclusive. What were the differences in your feelings and in how you and your peers responded to these leaders? Use the Capella library to find research that supports your critical thinking on relational models of leadership. Assignment Description Complete the following: Describe the primary principles of relational theories. What common patterns or distinctions do you identify in the literature? Assess personal and group perspectives to resolve differing views in the workplace. Use a current or past work example. Describe personal barriers that prevent adoption of an exogenic perspective. Reflect on work experiences where you were at odds with others. What personal practices can you identify? Based on the literature you have read, consider what you can do to become more exogenic in the workplace. Your analysis should be written coherently to support a central idea, with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a business professional. Assignment Requirements Written communication: Demonstrate doctoral-level writing skills through accurate communication of thoughts that convey the overall goals of the analysis and do not detract from the message. Format: Use current edition APA formatting, including correct in-text citations, proper punctuation, double spacing throughout, proper headings and subheadings, no extra line spaces before headings and subheadings, proper paragraph and block indentation, no bolding, one-inch margins all around, and no bullets. References: Include at least 5 resources from the Capella library. Length: 35 pages, not including title, abstract, and references pages. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Hide

You’re going to need The “Founding Gardeners” book by Andrea Wulf. You can get it for free at libgen.is/ More on Topic : How did both figure into the United States attempts to define its national identity and chart out its economic, political, and cultural future? What ultimately became of the widespread conviction (at least in the nations earliest years) that farmers held the key to Americas future? In other words, as the nations economy grew, its territory expanded, and its politics became more divisive, did gardening and agriculture remain central to the United States national identity and economic strategy? Explain, using specific examples from the book to make your case. The paper must be in proper essay form (indented paragraphs, an introductory paragraph containing a thesis statement, a series of body paragraphs in which you build your argument and develop examples, and a concluding paragraph in which you restate your thesis and, of course, state your conclusions). You must also cite the information that you pull from the book in the body of your paper. Please use the following format in doing so: (authors last name, page number). This is how each citation should look, for example: (Wulf, 124). Remember that direct quotes should ALWAYS be introduced (As Wulf argues, According to Wulf, etc.) AND contain a citation at the end of the sentence. Also remember that if even one of your body paragraphs does not contain at least one citation, you are not adequately citing your work and will be penalized accordingly. We need to know EXACTLY where you located the information included in the body of your paper. We WILL penalize papers that contain spelling and/or grammatical errors, so please do not submit a rough draft.
Hide

Why has the history of the 1965-66 mass killings in Indonesia been largely suppressed? What are the reasons for the recently renewed interest in this historical incident?