Identifying the significant correlation of cultural diversity and cultural intelligence in an organization Part 1 of the assignment consists of a schedule of the practical activities of the workshop (approximately 1200 words) and is based on topics discussed in class. You can be as creative as you wish in this part as long as you apply practically the chosen topic in the form of a professional workshop. Please take care to consider the following factors when designing your workshop: 1. The inclusion of activities that is relevant and interesting. 2 .The appropriate timing allocated to each of those activities. 3.The way in which the topics and activities are integrated. 4.The instructions that ensure the activities are facilitated well. 5.The potential barriers to the successful implementation of the activities. 6.The diversity of activities to suit the varied personalities of the participants. Part 2 consists of final comments (approximately 300 words) summarizing what you have hoped to accomplish through the workshop. Note: The workshop can be divided into 4 parts and relate to each other and should last for 3 hours. SAMPLE OR GIUDE THE LAYOUT OF THE INTERACTIVE WORKSHOP DESIGNED TO ADDRESS THE GARDNERS THEORY OF MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE The proposed workshop for identification of the type of intelligence using Gardners theory of multiple intelligence is divided into four modules. Please find the table form below which presents todays workshop schedule. The workshops duration is one working day. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION PURPOSE 1. 9-10 am Icebreaker: Introduction of the group; participants choose the some cards that represent them; a short demo about the theory of multiple intelligences. Familiarizing with the subject and other participants. (2) 10-11.30 Group discovery and discussion about types of intelligences; forming 8 groups. Participants realisation of their intelligence type in accordance with Gardners theory of multiple intelligences; connecting with other people with the same prevalent intelligence type; discussion about having more than one intelligence type. 3. 11.30-12-30 Lunch 4. 12.30- 2 pm Pairing professions. Groups will choose the best types of intelligences for certain types of jobs. Discovery which types of intelligence are the best for certain job types. Discussion on how to implement different types of intelligence to different types of jobs. 5. 2-2.15 pm Tea & healthy snack break 6. 2.15-4 pm Charades and group presentations about the types of intelligence and on how to improve ones certain The implementation of new knowledge on how to improve individually. Discovering the proper learning styles appropriate for each type of intelligence. type of intelligence. 7. Closure. Icebreaker: Participants come to the room and are asked to pick up randomly scattered cards with pictures that represent their interests, skills and abilities (there are 2 or 3 cards representing each type of Gardners 8 intelligences, there should be enough cards of each type for each participant to choose freely). After the participants choose their cards they take a sit and are asked to introduce themselves and say what are their interests. The idea of this is to see if the interests will go along with the type of intelligence they will be classified to in the next exercise. After the introduction the person leading the workshop will deliver a 15 minutes demo about the theory of multiple intelligences to give the participants an idea about it and later he will explain what to expect in the next exercise. Group discovery and discussion: Now participants have to look at their cards and discover to which group of intelligence they belong. There are 8 stations in the room to form groups. Logical-mathematical, verballinguistic, interpersonal, bodily-kinaesthetic, musical, special-visual, intrapersonal and naturalistic. Each station represents one type of intelligence and it has a piece of paper with the exact description of the type. If someone has chosen cards with 3 that represent 3 different types of intelligence they are free to decide which group represents their intelligence best. After everybody finds their group the facilitator will instruct the participants inside the groups to discuss why they feel they belong to a certain group and what skills and abilities they share and what are the differences between them. For next 15 minutes participants can also share their other types of intelligence and talk what other group they belong. During the last 20 minutes all participants are to discuss what they learned about the types of intelligence, what they had in common and how they felt belonging to one group. This exercise will make the participants realise that we are all intelligent in a different way. Pairing professions: The facilitator will form 8 new random groups. This will encourage participants to mix and get to know new persons, not only the ones from their groups. Each group has to find 3 types of jobs from 24 to choose from that will be suitable to the assigned intelligence type. The jobs to choose from are: lawyer, writer, journalist, accountant, scientist, auditor, surveyor, architect, engineer, physical therapist, mechanic, jeweller, musician, piano tuner, choral director, manager, psychologist, nurse, therapist, entrepreneur, counsellor, botanist, geologist, landscape architect. Each group will be asked to be creative and come up with at least two more job types for their intelligence type. The facilitator will lead a discussion about other types of intelligence that are suited for the selected job types. This should make the participants realise that people use more than one intelligence type for certain job and that the types may vary depending on the person. The groups have to prepare 5 min presentations about the intelligence types and what features of that type make someone a good placement for a certain profession. The facilitator will hand out cards and materials to make the presentations more creative. Thanks to the presentations all participant will have access to the discoveries of each individual group. Group presentations: The facilitator will ask the participant to form 8 groups, in accordance with the primary groups they formed in the group discovery exercise. The facilitator will hand out sheets covering different VARK learning styles (Visual, Aural, Kinaesthetic, Read/Write) for each group. The facilitator will shortly in 10 minutes explain the different VARK learning styles and explain the importance of the individual approach to learning. Each group will choose one learning style and delegate one representative to play charades. All other groups are supposed to guess which learning style the representative is trying to show them without speaking or writing. The only group that is not guessing is the group delegating the representative. After this little entertaining exercise each group, representing one type of intelligence, will be instructed to prepare a five minutes presentations explaining the assigned to them type of intelligence and also discuss which learning style suits the best to this type. The groups should also cover how this knowledge could be implemented in the organisation The groups can be as creative as they wish to be. The facilitator will explain that the participants can play out little scenes to better explain their point or present a little case study. After the presentations all the participants will discuss with the facilitator the phenomenon of multiple intelligences and how it is not easy to classify someone to just one type. The participants will be encouraged to share their feelings about being classified to one type of intelligence and what are their takeaways from todays workshop. This exercise will give the participants the idea of learning styles to choose from in accordance with their type of intelligence. The potential barrier in these exercises are the personalities and attitudes of the participants. The outcomes are strongly dependant on the participants engagement and active participation. EXPECTATIONS OF THE WORKSHOP: This workshop had a couple of main purposes. The first purpose was strongly informative and introductory to Gardners theory of multiple intelligences. It is important that employees in the organisational environment are aware of different types of intelligence, as it is well known to judge people according to their level of IQ. The workshop hopefully helps the participants understand that even when someone is not very fluent with numbers or maths they can be still intelligent but in a different way. It is crucial for the employees and managers to understand the theory of multiple intelligences to fully use the human resources potential in the organisational environment. Secondly, this workshop was aiming to make the participants realise which type of intelligence they posses. Moreover, it was hoped the participants find more than one type of intelligence within them. The workshop schedule also covered the subject of the VARK learning styles with the goal of implementation this new knowledge and combining it with the knowledge about the theory of multiple intelligences. If managers could recognise the type of intelligence of their employees they could use proper teaching/learning techniques in order to execute the best outcomes. The underpinning purpose of this workshop was to make the participants realise how much the theory of multiple intelligences and the different learning styles are relevant to the organisational environment. In todays global world big organisations employees are becoming global citizens and they have to gain new skills and attitudes to succeed in the global business environment. This workshop aimed to enhance the participants skills like flexibility and adaptability, communication and collaboration skills, as well as sense of urgency by doing the exercises and presentations with short preparation time.

For this assignment you will respond to three case studies.What is a Case Study?“A case study is a narrative used to help you practice real-life analysis and communication skills. It is a learning tool that provides readers with “enough detail…to understand the nature and scope of the problem, and…serve as a springboard for discussion and learning” (O’Rourke, 2007, p. 391).Your completed case studies should be 750 words, and all sources must be properly cited using APA format.CASE STUDY #1Amy is cooking dinner for her family. She moves to pull a pot off the stove and accidently touches the burner. She reflexively pulls her finger away from the stove and immediately feels the pain.Which receptor neuron is responsible for sending information from her finger to her peripheral nervous system?Is this receptor neuron, an afferent or efferent neuron?Explain where the information from the receptor neuron is sent and how does it result in Amy moving her finger away from the stove.Describe the three classes of neurons involved in this response.Evolutionarily, why do you think the human body has this system in place?What might happen if we did not have this response?CASE STUDY #2Glen, who is 45 years old, begins to notice that his hands shake (tremors) when he is performing everyday tasks such as signing his signature. His family members have noticed that he also has muffled speech and tends to shuffle when he walks. He is diagnosed with Early Onset Parkinson’s disease.What is Early Onset Parkinson’s disease?What specific cell type is affected in Parkinson’s disease?What is dopamine? What effects does dopamine have on the body?Explain the structure of a synapse and why Glen’s neurologist would prescribe him a dopamine agonist?Glen has genetic testing performed and it is determined that he does carry an autosomal dominant mutation in the SNCA gene associated with Early Onset Parkinson’s disease. Glen has three children. Would you advise his children to have genetic testing performed to determine if they also carry the disease mutation? Why or why not?CASE STUDY #33. Patricia, who is 37 years old, discusses with her physician recent symptoms that she has experienced including blurred vision, numbness in her fingers and face, dizziness, fatigue and weakness. The physician performs multiple neurological tests and she is diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS).What is MS?Is MS a disease of the central or peripheral nervous system?What is the main cell structure affected in MS?How is the action potential of a neuron affected in MS?The origins of MS are not clear. What do scientists hypothesize to be the causes of MS?Your assignment should be written in an essay format. The assignment requires you to include details from research including the course materials and sources you locate on your own. Remember to use APA format to cite your sources of information, both within parenthetical citations and also within a reference page at the end of the project.Basic Writing Requirements:750 words not counting the title or reference pages.Include a title page, double space, font size 10 or 12.Include a well-developed introduction and conclusionProvide exceptional content.Demonstrate superior organization: use logic.Free of grammar and spelling errors.Use APA style for all citations and references.

10 discussion posts each consisting of 200 – 300 words not including the reference section, and should provide a summary of the key arguments within the core question. Provide support for your arguments using theory, literary sources and applied organisational examples and wider reading in line with the Harvard Referencing Guidance. Please provide your initial post looking at the question: Looking at the major changes that are facing the contemporary business world, consider what impact this has on the way that managers operate within the work place. What are managers doing differently now compared to their management practices before the changes, with regards to their approach to managing individuals. Within this response consider: Personality, perceptions, values and the impact that this will have on performance and individual motivation.

Its mission is to protect the health of all Americans and to provide essential human services, especially to those least able to help themselves. It comprises 11 major operating divisions, including those that make up the Public Health Service. Three of these divisions are the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Research and write a 4-6 page report on one of the following agencies: NIH, FDA, or CDC. Be sure to explain the agencys role in health services. How does the organization increase the health security of our nation? What are some examples of advances of the organization in our public health history, and what is the mission of the organization going into the future? Finally, what are the primary concerns of those who oppose an expanded role of government in health care?

Every year, you may hear more and more about Accountable Care Organizations. Generally referred to as ACOs, these are groups of doctors, hospitals, and other healthcare providers that come together voluntarily to give coordinated high-quality healthcare to their Medicare patients. The goal of coordinated care is to ensure that patients, especially the chronically ill, get the right care at the right time while avoiding unnecessary duplication of services and preventing medical errors (Centers for Medicare, 2019). As a healthcare administrator, you must ensure that you understand the various types of healthcare organizations available for your facility, your employees, and your patients. ***For this assignment, you examine Accountable Care Organizations and the programs that are supported by them, as well as the best practices used by these programs in the effort to guarantee high-quality care to their Medicare patients. ****References: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2019). Accountable care organizations (ACO). Retrieved from https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/ACO/index.html?redirect=/ACO Peer-reviewed Articles: Devereaux, S., Debra; Z, David (2018). Population health management: A community imperative. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 75(2), p.46-48 https://proxygw.wrlc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=127211499&site=ehost-live&scope=site&authtype=ip,uid&custid=s8987071 Ritchie, C.; Leff, B (2018). Population Health and Tailored Medical Care in the Home: the Roles of Home-Based Primary Care and Home-Based Palliative Care. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 55(3), pp.1041-1046. https://proxygw.wrlc.org/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392417305420 Gottlieb, L; Glymour, M; Kersten, E; Taing, E; Hagan, E; Vlahov, D; Adler, (2016). Challenges to an integrated population health research agenda: Targets, scale, tradeoffs, and timing. Social Science & Medicine, 150, pp.279-285. https://proxygw.wrlc.org/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953615302124

The topic is adoption issues historically. it must be divided into 3 subsections: transracial, inter-country, and same sex adoptions. It must include at least one legal source such as a piece of legislature, or a court case that has dealt with the issues. The minimum is one legal source but this is a legal research paper so the more legal sources the better. It must also include some footnotes. The citations must be in bluebook format. This is for a law school research paper.

HARRIET FARRELL. Killing: infanticide. 19th February 1829 Read the Harriet Farrell infanticide case. In your initial post of approximately 200wds summarize the history of the Infanticide Law gathered from information on the Old Bailey Website and post it. Next, in your discussion threads state whether or not you believe Harriet strangled or suffocated her infant? In your subsequent threads assess the expert and witnesses’ testimony, The use of forensics and theory of the crime, and why the court found Elizabeth “not guilty” of infanticide, but guilty of another charge?

Topic:Describe a time in your personal or professional lives when collaboration with others was necessary and resulted in a successful outcome.Questions to help guide your writing: Did all team members (family or friends) actively collaborate or were there others who were resistant? Throughout the collaboration, was conflict noted and if so, how was it addressed?Readings:Shankman, Allen, & Haber-Curran: pp. 187-203Why Does Great Collaboration Require Good Conflict? – Lynda McDermott, n.d.Driving Change: Strong Leadership and Collaboration Are Required – Duncan Saltonstall, 2019Videos:TEDTalk: Margaret Heffernan: Dare to Disagree

When is group or organizational conflict necessary?The consciousness of Others: discuss the conflict in terms of management and as a catalyst or inhibitor of change. We will also continue to engage in self-assessment as this relates to leadership.Readings:Shankman, Allen, & Haber-Curran: pp. 187-203Why Does Great Collaboration Require Good Conflict? – Lynda McDermott, n.d.Driving Change: Strong Leadership and Collaboration Are Required – Duncan Saltonstall, 2019Videos:TEDTalk: Margaret Heffernan: Dare to Disagree

Tell us about a place or community you call home. How has it shaped your perspective?