In a written paper of 1,250-1,500 words, evaluate the current forces driving change in your field or industry. As a leader, or considering the role of a leader, assess your organization and evaluate how well it is responding to the forces, and identify where there is a need for change. Develop a vision to inspire this change. Include the following:
1.Describe your organization, include the organization’s mission, and identify the various stakeholders.
2.Identify the external and internal forces that drive organizational change in your field or industry. Explain the origin or reason for these internal or external driving forces. Explain how these forces directly affect the viability of your organization.
3.Choose one of the driving forces. Describe the specific issues this driving force creates, or will potentially create, for your organization or department.
4.Propose the steps needed for your organization or department to respond to this driving force.
5.Predict how employees at various levels in the organization will respond to your proposed change initiative.
6.Develop a vision for change. Describe how this vision correlates with the organization’s mission, and how you will present this vision to internal stakeholders.
7.Predict how you think your vision will assist internal stakeholders in supporting the change initiative. Identify potential considerations posed by stakeholders, and discuss how you will respond.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA

Reaction paper guidelines
You are reviewing the following book: Steve Bogira (2005). Courtroom 302: A Year Behind the Scenes in an American Criminal Courthouse, Knopf; 1st edition.
Reaction paper content:
PART 1: A SUMMARY OF THE WORK (between 4-5 pages long)
To develop the first part of a report, do the following:
Identify the author and title of the work and include in parentheses the publisher and publication date.
Write an informative summary of the material for most chapters your read
Condense the content of the work by highlighting its main points and key supporting points.
Use direct quotations from the work to illustrate important ideas.
Summarize the material so that the reader gets a general sense of all key aspects of the original work.
Do not discuss in great detail any single aspect of the work, and do not neglect to mention other equally important points.
Also, keep the summary objective and factual. Do not include in the first part of the paper your personal reaction to the work; your subjective impression will form the basis of the second part of your paper.

PART 2: YOUR REACTION TO THE WORK (8-10 pages)
To develop the second part of the report, do the following:

Please make sure this is both your professional and personal reaction to the book
How is the assigned work related to ideas and concerns discussed in the course for which you are preparing the paper? For example, what points made in the course reading materials and class discussions are connected to the ideas in the book?
How is the work related to problems in our present-day world?
How is the material related to your life, experiences, feelings and ideas? For instance, what emotions did the work arouse in you?
Did the work increase your understanding of a particular issue? Did it change your perspective in any way?
Evaluate the merit of the work: the importance of its points, its accuracy, completeness, organization, and so on.
You should also indicate here whether or not you would recommend the work to others, and why.
Who is preferred audience for this book?

Fidel Castro articulated a revolutionary vision in his 1953 trial defense, known as
History Will Absolve Me. Upon what document does the young Castro base his revolutionary struggle? What are the key revolutionary laws he hopes to implement if he comes to power? Is this a socialist document?

History will absolve me doc. Link: https://www.marxists.org/history/cuba/archive/castro/1953/10/16.htm

Using the South University Online Library research how to create a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation. Based on your research, create a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation that satisfies the following parameters:

The presentation demonstrates an understanding of its purpose and its audience.The presentation has an effective introduction, body, and conclusion.The presentation follows the appropriate parts of the 10/20/30 rule.The template used for the presentation is appropriate for the audience and the message in terms of text, color, artwork, and graphics.The presentation slides demonstrate an appropriate use of graphics and artwork.Speaker notes are provided.Materials are correctly cited and the final page lists the references correctly.

-Describe the legal relationship between patient and provider. -Discuss the importance of the original Patient Bill of Rights.

Create a 7- to 10-slide PowerPoint Presentation that summarizes the history of waste management and regulation. Use the notes section in PowerPoint to narrate your presentation. Be sure to address the following:
Provide one example of how a pre-industrial (before the 18th century) society or civilization handled its waste.
Include the main events that occurred during each of the periods defined in the textbook (post-war, globalization, and implementation and progress).
Describe the five main international bodies concerned with waste.
Define RCRA, NEPA, and CERCLA, and discuss how they influence waste management.
All sources used, including the textbook, must be cited and referenced according to APA style. Be sure to include in-text citations on your slides, and provide a reference slide that lists all of your sources.

Please read the advocacy role that a principal can play in special education instruction and explain if you agree with the suggestions?

New Times Roman – 12 font The readings for session four are related to relational approaches to leadership. This approach to leadership emphasizes the relationship between the leaders and followers and the impact these relationships have on each other. For the written assignment on the relational approach you have to write a paper that demonstrates evidence of your understanding of the various aspects of transformational leadership. In order to write the paper, you should evaluate the behavior of a leader with whom you have interacted regularly or with whom you currently interact (could be your direct supervisor). If you are not currently employed, evaluate the behavior of a leader/manager from your past (make sure that you evaluate somebody with whom you have had interactions for an extensive period of time – more than 6 months). You dont have to mention the name of the individual in your paper. Before you conduct the evaluation, please read chapter 8 on transformational leadership and gain a solid understanding of the key elements of this approach. As you think about your regular interactions with this individual, please explain whether this individual exhibits behaviors in accordance to the material discussed in chapter 8. If the leader exhibits the type of behaviors identified by this theory, explain what exactly he/she is doing and how the behaviors relate to this theory. If the individual is not exhibiting behaviors identified to be effective, please explain the reasons you consider that his/her behavior is lacking and what he/she should do in order to behave in accordance with elements of the theory from chapter 8 (you can use one of the approaches to transformational leadership discussed in this chapter – the 4 Is (idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, individualize consideration), or Bennis and Nanus’ approach, or Kouzes and Posner’s Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership approach). Make sure that you cite the proper readings and theories in your explanation. The paper should be 3-3.5 pages long (without the cover page and reference section) and should be written using the APA style (double space). Please make sure that you use proper writing style with proper grammar and proper formatting. Also, please include a cover page with the following information: your name, course number (FA2019G-S1) and course title (Theory & Pract of Leadership), and the title of the assignment and the date. PS – I don’t care who you use for the leader but for the purposes of this paper do not use my current supervisor. The teacher knows who my current leader is. The book we are using is (Leadership) Northhouse Theory and Practice – 8th edition.

Use the following resources: Race & crime 4th edition Chapter 4, Gabbidon and Greene: Chapter 4 The new Jim crow: Alexander: pp. 59-72 of Chapter 2; pp. 114-119 of Chapter 3 U.S. Department of Justice Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department,opens in a new window 2015, pp. 9-41, 62-67 and 69-102 (PDF formatopens in a new window) View:: How does police and prosecutorial discretion allow for racial and ethnic discrimination in the criminal justice system? Is allowing such discretion desirable, when used fairly? What are some ways of curbing or checking this discretion to make the system more fair? Do you think these things will be effective? Why or why not?

Hugo Mnsterberg describes watching a film as a complex psychological experience. What,
according to him, is the nature of that experience? What does Nol Carroll think is the flaw in
Mnsterbergs argument? Is Carrolls critique convincing? Refer to the films screened & readings below.

Screening: The Musketeers of Pig Alley (D.W. Griffith, 1914, U.S.; 18 mins.)
Screening: Vertigo (Alfred Hitchcock, 1958, U.S.; 2 hrs., 8 mins.)
Reading: Hugo Mnsterberg. The Psychology of the Photoplay. Film Theory Reader,
pp. 49-56.
Reading: Carroll, Nol. Film/Mind Analogies: The Case of Hugo Mnsterberg. Film
Theory Reader, pp. 57-68
Reading: Marc Furstenau. Introduction: Film Theory A History of Debates. Film
Theory Reader, pp. 1-20.

Report should be between 1,500 and 2,000 words (doublespaced, normal 12-point font). You are expected to demonstrate your familiarity with and understanding of the readings assigned in this course, as well as your ability, on the basis of these, to analyse sequences from films that we have seen. Provide a critical summary and evaluation of the main argument of the assigned reading(s) and address the specific issues in the question you are answering. Your Report must include relevant quotations from the reading(s). The Reports are cumulative. That is, as we proceed in the course, you will be expected with each Report to refer to relevant readings and films from previous weeks. You will be evaluated according to your ability to synthesise and employ the material we will be covering, finding connections between themes and concepts, and using appropriate examples from films screened.