NURS 500 DF Response Instructions (Classmate#1): Patterns of Knowing Master of Science in Nursing concentration Family Nurse Practitioner BOOK NAME: https://ambassadored.vitalsource.com/#/user/signin READ: Theoretical basis for nursing (5th ed.). – Chapters: 19 Knowledge development in nursing – Chapters: 3 & 5 – Video Coaching patients for successful Self-Management https://youtu.be/g-6Nxp9DBvo – American Nurse Credentialing Center https://www.nursingworld.org/organizational-programs/magnet/ AI Commons: Introduction to Appreciative Inquiry Do not use quotations in this discussion. Paraphrase your sources. Response Discussion Post Instructions: Respond to your classmate’s discussion post on Evidence-based Practice. My classmate was instructed to answer the following questions below in their discussion post: Topic In the Chinn and Kramer (2018) reading, chapter 5, the authors discuss personal knowing and its impact on nursing theory and nursing practice. Consider professional development of nursing and apply the concepts of personal knowing on the development of nursing practice. DIRECTIONS: For this weeks discussion post, address the following: 1) What is personal knowing; how does your personal knowing affect your personal professional development? 2) Identify and discuss 2 professional strengths and 2 weaknesses that you have? 3) How can you apply nursing theory to address your weaknesses and further develop your strengths? INCLUDE IN YOUR RESPONSE TO CLASSMATEs DISCUSSION POST: 1) Contrast your experiences of clinical decisions based on personal knowing with your peers experiences. 2) Compare your personal knowing with your peers pattern if knowing. 3) Discuss how your identified strengths and weakness differ (or are the same as) those of your peers. 4) In responding to your colleagues postings offer alternative questions and rationales for your suggestions. (Please state an open ended question in your response discussion post for my classmate to respond to) * Present new references that support your opinions. Support with at least 1 scholarly peer reviewed journal article to support your position is required. Peer reviewed journals must be LESS than 5 YEARS OLD, and from the UNITED STATES. (Your text book may be used as a source but does NOT count toward the 1 required references). References must be different from the references used in My Initial Discussion Post and Respond to this Post. I have uploaded a document labeled My Initial Discussion Post and Respond to this Post, so you can see the references used as well as the context. APA formatting applies and includes the following for your response post A) In text citations in APA format B) Reference list in APA format (include doi) Your response should be 250-300 words. In text citations do count in the word count, but references do not. Grading Rubric: Contribution of New Ideas 1. Contributed new information to the discussion by bringing in relevant ideas from outside course (prior knowledge). 2. Shared new perspective or analysis of ideas. 3. Substantive comments and questions that significantly helped to move the discussion forward. 4. One scholarly article in responding classmates essay are cited. Expression of Ideas; APA Style 1. Elaborated on ideas of classmate by sharing additional examples and adding further explanation 2. Discussion was expressed in a clear and respectful manner 3. APA style adhered to. No spelling or grammar errors; is within word limits, no quotations
Hide
