Using the South University Online Library; find two peer-reviewed journal articles on cutaneous sensation and/or perception. In your synopsis, you will include: A summary of each of the journal articles The main points discussed in each of the journal articles and how they relaSte to the week’s course and text readings Your thoughts and perspectives regarding the concepts covered in each of the journal articles
you conducted an annotated bibliography on a set of topics. For this assignment you use that information as a literature review. You will then develop a paper based on the information you collected as well as what you learned from your course and text readings. Here is the list of topic areas that was used. 1.The major theories associated with perception 2.Critical features of biology and physiology regarding sensation and perception 3.Articulate the connection between biology, physiology, and the environment 4.Processes associated with the perception of color, brightness, and contrast 5.Processes involved with perceiving objects, forms, depth, size, movement, and events 6.Critical elements involved with sound, localization, speech, and pitch perception 7.Cutaneous and chemical sensations in the process of perception 8.The influence of environmental context (e.g., geography) on perception The paper should adhere to the following guidelines: For the main sections it should have a: Title page Introduction Literature review Conclusion Reference page(s) The paper must use proper APA style for citing sources and references. Introduction: This should be 12 pages in length. The introduction provides a brief overview of what will be covered and the purpose of the paper. Literature review: The literature review is taken in part from what you had written in Week 3. Conclusions: The difference between a great paper and a marginal one is the depth and originality of the conclusion section. This is where you bring together what you learned from the literature review (as well as through the course) in your concluding remarks regarding your topic. The discussion and conclusion section should be 12 pages in length.
Topic for paper – For adults over age 65 (Population) does a daily 30 minute exercise regimen (Intervention) reduce the future risk of heart attack (Outcome) compared with no exercise regimen (Comparison)? This needs to be a PICO paper with APA style writing – APA format and other information: This is a formal paper. Please use APA format and remember that any thoughts and ideas that are not your own should be referenced and cited using the correct format. Direct quotes should be used sparingly but must also follow APA requirements. The paper should use clear, concise language, correct grammar and spelling, headings and subheadings as needed using APA format to organize the paper. References should be current, typically within the last 5 years and in APA format. The paper length can be up to 7 pages. Any paper going beyond 7 pages will be returned for revision without grading. A penalty of 5% will be automatically deducted for returned papers. The page count does not include the title page or the reference page.
Hide
Write a 12- to 14-page double-spaced term paper (not including the title and reference pages). You will pick one of the two personality perspectives for which you developed an Annotated Bibliography in Week 3 Project and write your paper on that perspective. Click here to download the Week 5 Project Term Paper Template. Step 2: You will also need to find 3 additional scholarly articles on your chosen personality perspective. Please refer back to the assignment instructions for Week 3 Project for details on the type of articles to select. Step 3: When developing your paper use the following competencies as a guide: Identify, understand, and discuss the major theories of personality. Compare and contrast the major theories of personality. Discuss the major principles associated with personality theory. Understand the historical context of personality theory development. Discuss personality theory with regard to current trends. Discuss the connection between historical and current trends in personality theory. Evaluate the development of personality across the lifespan. Analyze personality theory in the context of gender and environmental influences. Step 4: Organize your paper to include these main sections: Title page Abstract (not more than 250 words) Introduction Literature review Conclusion Reference page(s)
The purpose of this assignment is to identify an organizational problem to solve within your current workplace or industry and construct a problem statement that can be used as the basis for an action research project. For this assignment, the first step is to identify an organizational problem to solve within your current workplace or industry. This is an opportunity for you to apply your learning while addressing a real-world problem. Part of completing an action research project is clearly identifying and stating the organizational problem that needs to be resolved through the use of a problem statement. The problem statement must clearly articulate the single goal of the action research project. Use what you have learned in the Topic Materials to construct a problem statement for your action research project. Read and complete the “Writing a Problem Statement” handout to construct your problem statement. Submit the completed handout to your instructor.
The purpose of this assignment is to use an affinity diagram to brainstorm and identify root causes of the organizational problem and potential solutions for addressing it. Used Car dealership, customers buying other places after coming to our lot Now that you have identified the basic problem you want to resolve within your organization, you will need to think about root causes for the problem. Read the Topic Materials and the “Brainstorming With an Affinity Diagram” handout to help you narrow and specify the cause(s) for the problem. Complete the affinity diagram action steps outlined on the “Brainstorming With an Affinity Diagram” handout, including the “Five Whys Root Causes Analysis.” This can be done using online mind mapping resources like those found in the Topic Materials, by using post-it notes, or through the use of Excel or Word documents and tables. When constructing the affinity diagram, be sure to complete all six steps described on the handout. You will reference these root causes
Formatting Paper: * Submit Paper in MS Word Format * Follow APA Format (6th. Edition) NO Footnotes Needed * 12point Font – Times New Roman * Error Free * Must Meet Assigned Word Length * Reference Requirements * Double Spaced For this task, imagine that you have been asked to put together a 75-minute workshop proposal on some aspect of positive youth development as it is practiced within your particular setting of choice (i.e. juvenile justice, public education, parks and recreation, athletic training, sports coaching, early childhood, non-profit community organizations, faith-based organizations). Imagine that your presentation will be given to your peers at a national meeting or conference in your particular work area. In your proposal, include the following: a. Session Title (15 words maximum) – Positive Youth Development: Diversity & Inclusion b. Session Description (100 words or less. This would be a description of the session that will appear in the printed conference program) c. Session Justification (200 to 300 words. Provide a justification for why this session is important for professionals in your area of the field. This section should provide clear links with references to the course resources) d. Session Learning Outcomes (Include 2-3 objectives for what participants will gain from attending your session e.g., knowledge, skills, techniques, tools ) e. Session Outline (Provide a detailed outline of your session, including topics that you intend to cover, activities, and how you intend to use your 75 minutes) f. Speaker Information (You can include up to 3 speakers including yourself. List all of your speaker names, agency/university affiliations, and their qualifications/justification for being included. Weve been working to identify researchers who study specific aspects of PYD. You may also know practitioners who are good leaders/speakers in your area of interest.) Below you’ll find a list of three speakers. Your session will be judged (rather, points will be awarded) based upon how appealing your session would be to conference participants, the quality of your justification as grounded in theory and research, the quality of the session outline, the usefulness and rigor of the session learning outcomes, and the relevance and justification of the speakers. Speaker #1: Dr. Esmilda Abreu-Hornbostel I think of myself as a builderI use my deep understanding of systems and people to respond to an organizations critical needs. Im also really a change agentI look at what needs to happen and whats missing and then I create consensus about what to do and enroll people in taking action to advance progress. I have been a champion for social justice my whole life, and now, as a professional, I help organizations navigate complex interpersonal, political, legal, and societal challenges as they drive towards delivering greater social good. Bringing together the disciplines of business management, human behavior, organizational development, and education, I work to promote diversity, equity, and strategic innovation in organizations I serve. I believe inclusive and cohesive teams create new possibilities. One friend calls me the Thermostathe says Its important to have someone on your team that can give you an accurate read on everyones temperature, but when you have Esmilda involved, you can actually change an organizations environment. Shes always finding ways to pro-actively address whats happening at our campusbuilding bridges, making connections between different areas, and raising expectations. Another colleague says, If you hear the word impossible, Esmilda hears aha theres opportunity here, and then she makes it happen. Im not sure how she does that, but Im always amazed! Currently, I am the Assistant Vice President for Student Affairs at Pratt, where Ive transformed their approach to providing excellent student support while balancing institutional risk. My specialties include: Leadership and Mentoring, Higher Education and Student Success, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, Threat Assessment, Crisis Management, and Conflict Resolution, Institutional Research and Performance Assessment, and Strategic Planning and Innovation. Speaker #2: Carl Hampton, J.D. Experienced leader and strategist with demonstrated experience in diversity, equity and inclusion institution programs and community outreach efforts in higher education environments. Key strengths include effectively leveraging partnerships across diverse stakeholder groups to drive a systems approach to inclusion, diversity and access for college-bound students. I build student support programs and measure their effectiveness and impact on student achievement and persistence; grow partnerships that support college readiness and bring businesses and community leaders together to mitigate barriers to education and the workforce and influence job placement for Wisconsin post-baccalaureate students. Speaker #3: George Zavala I want to develop a foundation for my future goals of working to serve youth and adults seeking rehabilitation and re-entry into society. I believe that a feeling of connectedness within a community is essential, and I am passionate because I want to help build communities and create inclusion for those around me.
Hide
Write a research paper discussing the legality of the usage of armed drones under international law. The paper should include laws, cases, treaties, articles, UN resolutions rulings or examples to justify its hypothesis and conclusion.Sections of the paper should include; Introduction, Research questions, literature review, a theological framework, methodology, analysis/discussion and conclusion.
– 6 pages, single-spaced(Title page, Abstract Introduction (with thesis), Body, Conclusions, References) – Critical, relevant and consistent connections are made between the evidence and thesis. – Writing is clear and relevant, with no grammatical and/or spelling errors. The paper is polished and professional. The reference section is properly formatted and references are correctly cited. – Attached files are brief outline and some references you can choose to use writing the paper.
HTT700 Current Issues in Tourism / Hospitality Luxury Management Assignment #2 – 10% of total class grade Like all other businesses, luxury companies are confronted to the growing customer awareness about sustainability, pollution, and climate change and the increasing push for firms to integrate environmental issues to their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) strategies. You can choose one of the two following topics (make sure to specify the topic in your introduction): Option A. The French group Kering has been the luxury firm leader in tackling sustainability and climate change. Discuss with examples from Kering and other companies why addressing climate change is important for the luxury sector. Option B. A unique and award-winning hotel in Canada is the Fogo Island Inn. Sustainability is for them a driving principle, but they are a rare example. Is luxury hospitality compatible with sustainability? Each paper should discuss and include references to at least 4 academic research papers. Your paper should be between 1000 and 1200 words (no more than two pages single-space), not including the reference list. Make sure to structure your paper with: A title, Headings and paragraphs, A reference list (APA style) The paper will be graded based on: Presentation, spelling and grammar Originality Depth of the argument, use of references to support the argument / ideas
