Writing Help

In this assignment, you will use Microsoft PowerPoint to create a detailed presentation with a minimum of 10 slides on the impact that the Soviet Union had on global terrorism until its fall in 1991. Include the war between the Soviet Union and Afghanistan within your presentation.Secondly, you will also be required to discuss the change in global terrorism in modern-day Russia from 1991 to today. Include the current terrorist groups that target Russia as well as what led to their creation.Please be sure to add notes and commentary on each slide of your presentation. Your submission should also include photographs, graphs, charts, data analytics, and examples of terrorist attacks within the borders of Russia.You are required to use at least your textbook and two outside scholarly or government sources.

you will be writing a research paper on a domestic terrorist incident that has occurred in the United States. write on the recruitment and radicalization process of lone wolf terrorists in the domestic United States and abroad using the Internet and social media platforms. Why do terrorists focus on soft targets? This research paper will also analyze the sociological and psychological impacts that these attacks have had on society. You will be required to submit three to five recent examples from the past decade in your final submiss ion. For your conclusion, you will offer strategies that can be used to further strengthen the Internet and social media platforms from being used to recruit members, promote propaganda, and radicalize terrorists.Please complete Parts I and II below, which will serve as the first steps toward meeting the requirements for the Unit VII Research Paper.Part I: Research Paper TopicConduct research to identify a domestic terrorist incident that has occurred in the United States. This research can be accomplished through an Internet searchResearch Topic Justification: In a minimum of one paragraph, identify your topic of choice, and discuss your rationale for choosing the topic. Why is the topic important to the field of homeland security? Does it meet the criteria listed above? This topic must be approved by your professor.Part II:you will complete an annotated bibliography.The annotated bibliography required to locate 7–10 scholarly peer-reviewed references from Google Scholar; or from local, state, or federal government websites. You will also be required to submit 100-word annotations for each reference. It is recommended to begin locating reference material as soon as possible.

In this assignment, you will write an essay that examines the rise of one of the Jihadist networks to include: ISIS, Boko Haram, and Al Qaeda. You will research that group’s background, recruitment tactics, and targets. Additionally, you will reflect on one recent attack from the past 5 years from your selected group.Answer the following questions in your essay.What is a Jihadist network?Where does your selected group primarily operate? (Cite specific geographic locations such as country, region, and/or province.)What are the psychological and primary motivators for your selected group?What are the psychological and primary motivators for your selected group, and what sociological impacts exist?What are the organization’s targets? How are they chosen?What has the United Nations (UN) done to counter the terrorist organization? Are these efforts effective?

1) How do you see yourself as a change agent guiding others to move from a process focus to an outcomes focus? 2) Discuss this in relationship to your area of concentration practice 3) Elaborate the rationale behind the change from process to outcomes. INCLUDE IN YOUR RESPONSE TO CLASSMATEs DISCUSSION POST: To ensure that your responses are substantive, respond to at least three of these prompts: 1) Respond to classmates other postings with substantive comments. Substantive comments add to the discussion and provide your fellow students with information that will enhance the learning environment. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you arent just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature. 2) In responding to your colleagues postings offer alternative questions and rationales for your suggestions. (Please state an open ended question in your response discussion post for my classmate to respond to) * Present new references that support your opinions. Support with at least 1 scholarly peer reviewed journal article to support your position is required. Peer reviewed journals must be LESS than 5 YEARS OLD, and from the UNITED STATES. (Your text book may be used as a source but does NOT count toward the 1 required references). References must be different from the references used in My Initial Discussion Post and Respond to this Post. I have uploaded a document labeled My Initial Discussion Post and Respond to this Post, so you can see the references used as well as the context. APA formatting applies and includes the following for your response post A) In text citations in APA format B) Reference list in APA format (include doi) Your response should be 250-300 words. In text citations do count in the word count, but references do not. Grading Rubric: Contribution of New Ideas 1. Contributed new information to the discussion by bringing in relevant ideas from outside course (prior knowledge). 2. Shared new perspective or analysis of ideas. 3. Substantive comments and questions that significantly helped to move the discussion forward. 4. One scholarly article in responding classmates essay are cited. Expression of Ideas; APA Style 1. Elaborated on ideas of classmate by sharing additional examples and adding further explanation 2. Discussion was expressed in a clear and respectful manner 3. APA style adhered to. No spelling or grammar errors; is within word limits, no quotations
Hide

The DNP must have a basic knowledge of methodology and design. With this knowledge the DNP can identify how methodology and design can be used to evaluate the validity of research studies. This assignment will allow you to describe your understanding of methodology and design while examining external and internal validity of three studies. General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Use at least three additional scholarly research sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used. Learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Directions: Locate three articles, one quantitative, one qualitative, and one mixed-method related to your DPI topic. Topic Area Successful daily self-management of type 2 diabetes among adults is important in achievement of positive health outcomes. Successful self-management of a chronic condition is a sense of self-efficacy and indicates a feeling of confidence in the patients abilities for self-management. Create a comparison table, using correct APA formatting, to describe the methodology and design used within each article. The table will be provided as an Appendix to the paper. Write a 1,000 to 1,250 words paper discussing the different methodologies and designs used in each study. Discuss the external and internal validity issues associated with each methodology and design. 1. Discuss the external and internal validity issues associated with each methodology and design. 2. Describe how using a different methodology or design might have been beneficial for each study and describe why. 3. Summarize the paper. 4. Conclusion Ten (10) references You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting.
Hide

Write a research paper on Buck Vs. Bell. Did this case change any laws? What was the outcome of the case? Each discussion paper should be based on an issue, case, statute, or dispute related to one of the topics in the syllabus (session 9 has two topics; the paper may focus on an issue related to either one). It should be based in part on the reading. It should show that you have followed up on the reading by reviewing some of the sources cited in the text relevant to your analysis. The paper should not be a summary of the chapter, but rather an analysis of one or two of the issues in the chapter. The best papers will include outside research. Please take full advantage of the electronic resources available to you through library.gmu.edu. Do not simply use Google or Bing or similar research tools; these are unlikely to find good academic material. Good choices for subjects for the discussion papers include the legal decisions appended to most of the chapters, a legal case described in the chapter, or another interesting issue raised in the chapter. Each paper should be at least 500 words long (not including footnotes) and no more than 1500 words (not including footnotes). You may pick any four topics except the topics covered in session 1 and session 14. The paper is due by 9:00 pm the night before the class during which the topic will be discussed so that I have time to review the papers before class. The paper should be submitted via Blackboard. I anticipate that the students who wrote on the topic of the session will be among the discussion leaders. I hope that by chance the papers will be divided more or less evenly over the semester. My intention is to give students both the flexibility of choosing topics that interest them and the ability to avoid due dates that cause major conflicts with some other paper or project. If students are putting this obligation off until the last four sessions of the semester, they and the class will not be well served by this exercise, and I will begin to assign certain sessions to students randomly. please refer to this book The Law of Healthcare Administration, 8th edition (2017), by J. Stuart Showalter. T
Hide

Describe and provide rationale for which design you plan to use in your DPI project. Be sure to indicate how your design in aligned with the methodology chosen in Topic 1 Quantitative study design with a cohort study method. 2 references

In a leadership role, you will learn that there is an abundance of responsibilities, especially with regards to making important decisions. Decisions can be harder to make if you have a close working relationship with individuals. Place yourself in the seat of a member on the leadership team (manager, director, CEO, president, VP, etc.). Pick a scenario, from the list below, and discuss how you would go about making your decision based on your knowledge. Layoffs: You are challenged with a decision to layoff a team member who has been loyal to the organization for many years and has ultimately become your friend. **** I LIKE THIS BELOW SCENARIO******** Hiring: There are two people who qualify, for a position, in your department. One person has years of experience while the other person has the education. Sexual harassment: An employee has filed sexual harassment against a manager, who happens to be a close confidante of yours. Theft: A manager is suspected of stealing from the organization. This manager happens to be your relative. This is an opportunity to get creative and also showcase your leadership skills. You may fill in the blanks however you would like. Be specific in providing the details of the scenario you choose. Additionally, you will need to address the process of your thinking regarding how you would go about making your decision and why you would choose this decision. Please use subtitles for each section. The subtitles should be labeled as follows: Scenario (Discuss the scenario from the list and fill in the blanks to complete the situation.) Decision (Describe the process of thinking and why you chose this decision.) Position (This section will detail why you selected this decision.) Conclusion Use the textbook as well as three outside sources as references (a total of four references). Be sure to support and justify your positions and conclusions using relevant library sources. The paper will need to meet APA requirements. Additionally, it will need to be at least five pages and double-spaced. The title page and reference page will not count towards the page count. Assignment: It’s Your Call Objective of Exercise: In a leadership role, you will learn that there are an abundance of responsibilities, especially with regards to making important decisions. Decisions can be harder to make if you have a close working relationship with individuals. Place yourself in the seat of a member on the leadership team (manager, director, CEO, president, VP, etc.). Pick a scenario, from the list below, and discuss how you would go about making your decision based on your knowledge. Layoffs: You are challenged with a decision to layoff a team member who has been loyal to the organization for many years and has ultimately become your friend. Hiring: There are two people who qualify, for a position, in your department. One person has years of experience while the other person has the education. Sexual harassment: An employee has filed sexual harassment against a manager, who happens to be a close confidante of yours. Theft: A manager is suspected of stealing from the organization. This manager happens to be your relative. This is an opportunity to get creative and also showcase your leadership skills. You may fill in the blanks however you would like. Be specific in providing the details of the scenario you choose. Additionally, you will need to address the process of your thinking regarding how you would go about making your decision and why you would choose this decision. Please use subtitles for each section. The subtitles should be labeled as follows: Scenario (Discuss the scenario from the list and fill in the blanks to complete the situation.) Decision (Describe the process of thinking and why you chose this decision.) Position (This section will detail why you selected this decision.) Conclusion Use the textbook as well as three outside sources as references (a total of four references). Be sure to support and justify your positions and conclusions using relevant library sources. The paper will need to meet APA requirements. Additionally, it will need to be at least five pages and double-spaced. The title page and reference page will not count towards the page count.
Hide

Review W.L. Gore: Culture of Innovation, and supplemental readings included below, do additional research and answer these questions. You should prepare your report according to this format: Introduction/Context (write about one page summarizing the case; include the context that is, key issues and learning points) Q1 (list the question) A1 (your answer) Etc. Conclusion (write no more than one page of your conclusions and observations) Work cited Use list (bullets), graphs, charts, tables, etc. to make your report more effective (a sample is on Blackboard). Be sure to use data available in the Case supplemented with additional research. Your report must be between 4 and 5 pages, 1.5 space with font TNR11 ********************************************************* QUESTIONS: 1. Is W. L. Gore a successful enterprise? If so, why has it been so successful? What are some of the building blocks of its success? 2. Using the Case and supplemental readings included below, where would you place Gore on the Entrepreneurial Intensity Grid (fig 3.3 page 87)? Give specifics to support your response. 2. Would you like to work at W. L. Gore? Why or Why not? 3. Why dont more firms emulate or do what Gore does? Why are Gore-type businesses rare? Please see the uploaded file for all details and for the case study. Please follow all instructions
Hide

Write a research paper on Mostrom v. Pettibon. Did this case change any laws? What was the outcome of the case? Each discussion paper should be based on an issue, case, statute, or dispute related to one of the topics in the syllabus (session 9 has two topics; the paper may focus on an issue related to either one). It should be based in part on the reading. It should show that you have followed up on the reading by reviewing some of the sources cited in the text relevant to your analysis. The paper should not be a summary of the chapter, but rather an analysis of one or two of the issues in the chapter. The best papers will include outside research. Please take full advantage of the electronic resources available to you through library.gmu.edu. Do not simply use Google or Bing or similar research tools; these are unlikely to find good academic material. Good choices for subjects for the discussion papers include the legal decisions appended to most of the chapters, a legal case described in the chapter, or another interesting issue raised in the chapter. Each paper should be at least 500 words long (not including footnotes) and no more than 1500 words (not including footnotes). You may pick any four topics except the topics covered in session 1 and session 14. The paper is due by 9:00 pm the night before the class during which the topic will be discussed so that I have time to review the papers before class. The paper should be submitted via Blackboard. I anticipate that the students who wrote on the topic of the session will be among the discussion leaders. I hope that by chance the papers will be divided more or less evenly over the semester. My intention is to give students both the flexibility of choosing topics that interest them and the ability to avoid due dates that cause major conflicts with some other paper or project. If students are putting this obligation off until the last four sessions of the semester, they and the class will not be well served by this exercise, and I will begin to assign certain sessions to students randomly. please refer to this book The Law of Healthcare Administration, 8th edition (2017), by J. Stuart Showalter. T
Hide