Satisfaction Guarantee

First time here?

usewelcome15 to get 15% off

Write a 4 page double spaced essay that answers the question “In The Evasion chapters, does Mark Twain represent Jim as a racist stereotype?”

Write a 4 page double spaced essay that answers the question “In The Evasion chapters, does Mark Twain represent Jim as a racist stereotype?” Also, FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW PLEASE. Thank you. In the sentences of the intro before the last two, create a FOCUSED discussion that leads up to your question. This is the place for focused plot sum, focused description, and focused observations that you can then ask an interpretive question about (Why is this in the novel?). This is not the place to make interpretive claimstheres no room to prove them here. Save those for the thesis, the topic sentences, or for the subordinate claims made in the body paragraphs, where theres room to argue for them (this, by the way, is a mistake students frequently make). In the second to last sentence, you should state the question that your thesis is trying to answer. This, then, needs to be an interpretive question, one that can be answered only by quoting and interpreting passages. In fact, you should know this question before you know your thesis and you should NOT be able to answer it easily; you should have to do some researchthat is looking at relevant passages and interpreting their detailsin order to start creating your answer. If this is not the case, then your thesis is probably too obvious or ho-hum. Why questions work well because they ask about motivation. Example: Why does Hawthorne have Hester dress Pearl in the same colors and design as the scarlet letter? In the last sentence of your intro paragraph, you need to state your essays main interpretive-argumentative claim, the thesis. It should not be a plot-summary statement. It should not be something that would be obvious to someone who has read the text(s). It should not be a description. It should not be an observation (Instead, youd want an interpretive claim about the significance or meaning of what you are observing). It should be a statement that needs to be argued for by quoting passages and interpreting the details of those passages. It tends to be about motivation (the authors, the narrators, or a characters). If you find that your current thesis is doing any of the things it is not supposed to do, try asking about that statement So what? The answer to that is moving you much closer to an interpretive-argumentative claim. Aim towards creating a thesis that is complex enough that it can be broken down into 2 or more steps (or claims subordinate to the thesis), each of which will become the backbone of a topic sentence. Do NOT create a list; instead, create a complex interpretive claim: Hester dresses Pearl in scarlet-colored velvet and gold embroidery because she sees both her daughter and the letter as blessings because they are curses; only together can they complete the office of the scarlet letter: to make Hester a stronger woman and a more effective because more subtle rebel. Each topic sentence should be a piece of the thesis. So my first topic sentence would be something like Hester sees both her daughter and the letter as blessings because they are curses. My second one might be These curses make Hester a stronger woman. My third one might be These curses that are blessings make her a more effective, because more subtle, rebel. And my fourth one might be The A that Hester wears and her daughter can only complete the office of the scarlet letter together. Note each topic sentence is an argumentative-interpretive claim subordinate to the thesis, which is the main claim. No plot sum, no description, no observationbut rather interpretive claims about these. The topic sentence should be the first sentence of the body paragraph. After the topic sentence of each body paragraph, you need to focus tightly on supporting and developing that claim by using quotations of relevant passages and interpretations of the details of those passages. By interpretation, I mean a discussion that explains how the details can be read as supporting the topic sentences claim. When you are discussing a quotation, stay focused on the quotation itself; dont start talking about what happens after it or mentioning other passages like it in the book (unless these things are done in the service of interpreting your quotations details). I would follow a pattern of TS, intro to quote 1, quote 1, interp of quote 1, intro to quote 2, quote 2, interp of quote 2, intro to quote 3, quote 3, interp of quote 3. Remember the introduction to each quotation should give the essential information from the passages context so your reader will be able to comprehend the quotation as s/he reads it. Think: who, what, where, when. Write a conclusion paragraph that reminds us of the main pieces of your argument. Create a Works Cited page (even if there is only one entry) in MLA style. The basic format for a books entry is below. You will need to go to Purdue OWL and search on MLA Works Cited to see the format for other types of texts. You will also need to go to this site to see how to type up a Works Cited page. Basic Book Format: Last Name, First Name. Title of Book. Publisher, Publication Date. Gleick, James. Chaos: Making a New Science. Penguin, 1987. Polish for style. Avoid extreme claims (every memory he has of the country he shares with her). One counterexample proves such a claim wrong. Instead, be more subtle ( he shares many memories of the country with her). Avoid such extreme (categorical) words such as all, none, everyone, no one, always, never, etc. Avoid throughout the book and similar phrases. They are unnecessary most of the time. Cut excess words, phrases, sentences. Combine some sentences, using connections that show your logic (which, therefore, nevertheless, and, but, furthermore, however, etc.). Proofread grammar and punctuation. capitalization apostrophes with possessives spelling agreement (between noun and pronoun, subject and verb) avoidance of ambiguous pronouns correct internal citations: quotation (#). Book title goes in italics, NOT QUOTE MARKS! Reminders Remember to go through all the steps of the writing process in a timely fashion: Review your notes and the book in order to make an observation (Hester dresses her daughter like the scarlet letter) that you can then turn into a Why Question (Why does Hester dress ). Brainstorm passages and interpretations of details. Find a passage, interpret its details as much as you can, find another passage, interpret its details. Re-read your brainstorming notes, highlighting your best ideas. Pull these best ideas together into a thesis. Draft your essay, keeping in mind the structure you ultimately want to have but not getting too hung up on it at this point. Rethink your draft. Play devils advocate. Revise your draft Re-read a body paragraph, underlining your best ideas. Rewrite your topic sentence to reflect these best ideas. Revise your body paragraph so that it focuses on supporting your new topic sentence. After doing this for all your body paragraphs, revise your thesis so it reflects the new topic sentences. Remember, the thesis should synthesize the topic sentences into a one-sentence statement. Polish and proofread. Print out copies of your paper along the way so that if something happens to your computer or printer, you will still have something to turn in.

Describe the ten easy steps to raising a teen killer? Which do you think has the most influence and why?

You will answer the questions in a detailed and concise manner, be sure to use the book to support your answers, but do not cite from the text-use your own words and thoughts. The questions are based on “Inside the mind of a Teen Killer” by- Phil Chalmers 1. Compare and contrast the six different typologies of teen killers? 2. Discuss the ten common factors behind the making of violent and murderous teens? What are the top three reasons? 3. Discuss the three general effects of drug and alcohol on a teen killer. 4. discuss how bullying can lead to murderous teens and what can be done to prevent it? 5. Discuss guns and teens killing? Do you agree with Chalmers or not-and why? 6. Based on the reading, do you believe we handle teen killers appropriately in the legal system- why or why not? 7. Discuss the ” homicide triangle”? 8. Describe the ten easy steps to raising a teen killer? Which do you think has the most influence and why? 9. Describe the similarities between teen killers and serial killers. If any? 10. What was the most important or interesting fact you learned after reading Inside the Mind of a Teen Killer? Based on what you read, what if anything, can we do to solve this issue.
Hide

Post-Menopausal/Urologic Concerns

This project has two videos that you need to watch the best way to see them is Youtube. The titles are below. 1. North American Menopause Society. 2017: Tips for taking a sexual history. 2. 2016: Dr. Shifren Discuss GSM. Initial discussion post includes the following: Discusses the most surprising information learned in the required NAMS videos. GSM explanation includes definition, involved body systems and how GSM affects a womans quality of life. Discusses Dr. Shapiros GSM treatment recommendations AND includes an EBP journal article or guideline recommendation in addition to referencing the video in the response. Assesses level of comfort in taking a complete sexual history. Summarizes how the discussions sexuality information will impact future interactions with mature and elderly clients Initial discussion post is supported with appropriate, scholarly sources; AND?? Sources are published within the last 5 years ; AND? Reference list is provided with in-text citations to match; AND? A minimum of one scholarly reference is included in the initial post. Textbook is not used. Part 2 Initial discussion post includes the following: Discusses differences in male and female urinary tract risk factors. Discusses in which sex is a UTI more concerning and includes rationale with citation to EBP scholarly reference Discusses particular situations when treatment of UTI is not appropriate. Includes rationale with citation to EBP scholarly reference. Discusses the American Urology Association (AUA) recommendations for PSA testing. Includes age ranges for testing and additional necessary criteria to consider prior to testing. Summarizes pre PSA counseling: includes risks, benefits and statistics regarding testing results, possible further testing and mortality rates. Initial discussion post is supported with appropriate, scholarly sources; AND?? Sources are published within the last 5 years ; AND? Reference list is provided with in-text citations to match; AND A minimum of one scholarly reference is included in the initial post. Textbook is not used.

Write a report based on ICL cafe to identify two problems and make recommendations to solve the two problems

Attention: the reference please use the webpage as the reference source. ———————————————————————- Write a report based on ICL cafe to identify two problems and make recommendations to solve the two problems. ———————————————————————- The format please refer to the additional documents and photos, these are must followed. ——————————————————————- please write the report in above 800 words (without counting references)

Why did the Allies Win World War II

This paper is a little difficult. This paper must only use and cite only the documents I upload. The instructions and all other documents will be uploaded. I must draw concepts from Block 1 and History from Block 2. From Block 1 I would like to focus on Balance of Power, Deterrence, or Eslcation andTermeration. And History will come from Why the Allies Won and Germany Stagtey and Nazi Ideology. Please contact me immediately if you have any questions. The PDF files are required reading and the word documents are note taken in class. This is a short turn around.

Educating healthcare providers to reduce number of opioid prescription and patient overdoses.

DPI Topic Educating healthcare providers to reduce number of opioid prescription and patient overdoses. PICOT For adult patients aged 18-65 years with chronic pain, does educating providers who prescribe opioids in pain management practice compared to not educating providers reduce the prescribing practice of opioids (leading to a decrease in overdose reporting) within a period of four weeks? Note – Please see the attached files for further details.

analyse the phenomenon of the virtual teamwork

With the development of technology, virtual work has emerged as a solution for collapsing distances and assisting remotely located employees and managers to collaborate virtually. Where the remote work is not a necessity due to the separation by large distances but rather a choice, research demonstrates that organisations and employees benefit too. However, some managers fear that virtual teamwork compromises some traditional workplace benefits that they had taken for granted, such as collaboration and a sense of community. There is, therefore, a call for new solutions to maximise the benefits and to minimise the inadequacies of virtual teamwork. In your essay, using management theories critically analyse the phenomenon of virtual teamwork and answer these two questions: -What are the advantages and disadvantages of virtual teamwork? -What can managers do to bridge the virtual and real worlds of teamwork for the betterment of organisations and employees? *Management theories: Learning about management is based on studying, understanding and using theories of management to interpret various events, situations, trends, and experiences. Students must explicitly refer to the variety of available theoretical material regarding teamwork. Theoretical material (or, theory, in short, as used in the marking rubric) includes any theories, models, concepts, or research findings that are discussed in lectures, course readings and in peer-reviewed academic literature required and recommended for the use in this Essay (see the Leganto reading list), and sourced independently via research databases. 1.Introduction (up to 150 words) introduce the question/issue and how it is tackled in the Essay. Tip: an introduction can be written last after the Essay has been written to provide a lead as to what will follow. While using the heading Introduction is not compulsory, doing so will help the readers to identify the sections of your Essay. 2.Body of the Essay (up to 750 words) methodically address the questions, applying theoretical material provided in the week-6 lecture. Tip: Provide examples and other evidence such as research findings in the peer-reviewed journals you read, to substantiate (back up) your arguments. It is not compulsory but highly recommended to use the headings within the body of the Essay to provide the structure which will guide the readers through your arguments. 3.Conclusion (up to 100 words*) summarise the key points made in your Essay. Tip: a conclusion contains no new information. It summarises your insights/recommendations and investigations performed in the Body of the Essay. While using the heading Conclusion is not compulsory, doing so will help the readers to identify the sections of your Essay. 4.Reference List (excluded from the word count) accurately and consistently list all references mentioned within the Essay
Hide