Ethics see in the attachement area for better instructions IN red the questions to touch, I provided with some of the answers , I do not have time to do the discussion based on guidelines See questions in blue, and guidelines in red When writing for publication all authors are to contribute significantly, design, interpretation if data, writer, critique, each author must complete statement indicating participation in the development of the manuscript Based on your readings, describe the ethical aspects of conducting peer review and multiple authorship. Answer the following questions: 1. How would you proceed with determining order of authorship? Answer First author is the one who contributed the most to develop the manuscript, order is based on the contribution amount 2. What ethical considerations must be addressed? see copywrite, morals , copy , obtain written permits from the author to have a figure or table, special permits 3. How would you respond if you found an article in print that was very similar to a manuscript you submitted for review that had been rejected by the journal? I suggest to go to the Committee on Publication Ethics website. They have flowcharts for each case. In a similar case they did this: “What to do if you suspect a reviewer has appropriated an authors idea or data in such cases. Even if the other journal has published the paper first, the editor can consult the submission dates for confirmation. The first journal would then have to retract the paper on the grounds of plagiarism, if indeed this had been investigated and proven by the institution. It is hoped that the journal would follow the COPE guidelines on retraction. Since the journals review process was exonerated, it is really up to the author to pursue the matter and the editor should encourage the author to do this. The author and/or editor could consider contacting the grant giving body as well as the reviewers institution and ask them to investigate. The editor should also contact the editor of the journal that published the possibly plagiarised work and inform him/her of the situation.” From: https://publicationethics.org/case/suspicion-breach-proper-peer-reviewer-behaviour Post your evidence-based position addressing the above questions in less than 250 words. Post and response provide most of the content required by the promp. attempts to stimulate further thought and discussion. Use the articles provided as references Use the book Writing for Publication in Nursing 4th edition
Hide
