This assignment is designed to illustrate the importance of nurse-sensitive indicators in relationship to patient outcomes. Select a condition or a disease. Identify the nurse-sensitive indicators that relate to your selection and indicate if they are structural, process, or outcome in nature. Create a plan of care showing how you would employ the indicators to improve the outcome. Cite at least two sources in an APA-formatted reference page.

1) Read “American Airlines: Don Carty”2) Which of the issues we have covered in class this week do you see reflected in the article? Discuss 3 of them.

In early adulthood, how does an online social network educational strategy compared with traditional patient-physician face to face intervention affect lifestyle and behavior management to prevent cardiac risk factors over time?

Research is reading carefully, and thoroughly, in order to investigate, and gather information by summarizing and paraphrasing research material, into written form.First, you explore the research material. Then, you decide how much of it you want to write about. Finally, you put as much of your research material, into your own words, as required, in order to present it, in writing.You should:Ask yourself questions about the topic present in the research materialUse a dictionary and thesaurus, to assist you in paraphrasing and summarizing the material.Continuously think about how to evaluate and present the material you are researching, as you carefully paraphrase and summarize it.Student Learning Outcomes Addressed:Demonstrate ability to read, paraphrase, and summarize literary theory.Demonstrate ability to paraphrase and summarize theoretical concepts.Demonstrate ability to select and research scholarly material, in assigned source material.Demonstrate ability to use Academic English, to write clearly and cogently.Demonstrate ability to efficiently use time, in order to complete a structured research assignment.Core Competencies Addressed:Content reading skillsCritical thinking skillsEffective writing through appropriate language use and contentAssignments or Assessments:Go to your Content tab and click on the link for “The Blackwell Guide to Literary Theory”.Each of the paragraphs that you write should present a summary and explanation of key concepts.1) Research “The Nature of Literary Theory” (pp 2 – 5). Write a 250 word paragraph.2) Research “What is Literature? (pp. 5 – 9). Write a 300 word paragraph.3) Research “The Practice of Theory” (pp. 9-11). Write a 250 word paragraph.4) Research “The Rise of Literary Theory/Early influences on Literary Theory (pp. 15 – 20). Write a 300 word paragraph.5) Research “Modernist Trends in Literary Theory (pp. 20 – 27). Write a 300-400 word paragraph.6) Research “Social and Political Theory (pp. 28 – 32). Write a 300-400 word paragraph.7) Research “The Poststructuralist Turn” (pp. 32 – 39). Write a 300-400 word paragraph8) Research “Always Historicize” (pp. 39 – 51). Write a 300 – 400 word paragraph.9) Research “Theory at the Fin De Siecle” (pp. 51 – 54). Write a 200 word paragraph.10) Research “Conclusion” (pp. 53 – 54). write a 200 word paragraph.Readings:The Blackwell Guide to Literary Theory

Briefly, you will select two of the environmental organizations listed below (or e-mail me for approval of a relevant group not listed). You will then prepare an essay (3 – 4 pages, double-spaced) comparing and contrasting the two environmental organizations you have selected. Please cite accordingly and list any sources or websites used to prepare your essays. Please compare and contrast the two organizations based on the following criteria:What is the mission statement of each organization? Is each organization a grassroots group, nonprofit organization, trade association or professional society?When was each organization founded? How many members are associated with the organizations?What environmental issues does each organization focus on? Describe two current initiatives of each organization.What do you find are the major differences between the two environmental organizations that you have selected?How does each organization reflect (or contrast with) your own environmental worldview? Which of the two would you rather get involved with, and why?Some Examples of Environmental Organizations:Alaska Wilderness League (www.alaskawild.org/about_awl.html)American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (www.aceee.org)Beyond Pesticides/National Coalition Against Misuse of Pesticides (www.ncamp.org)Center for Environmental Citizenship (www.envirocitizen.org)Center for Environmental Health (www.cehca.org)Center for Health, Environment and Justice (www.chej.org)Children’s Environmental Health Network (www.cehn.org)Clean Water Action Project (www.cleanwateraction.org/)Conservation International (www.conservation.org)Earth First! (www.earthfirstjournal.org/efj/contact.cfm)Environmental Defense (www.edf.org)Friends of the Earth (www.foe.org)Greenpeace USA (www.greenpeace.org)Izaak Walton League of America (www.iwla.org)League of Conservation Voters (www.lcv.org)National Audubon Society (www.audubon.org)National Park Foundation (www.nationalparks.org)National Resources Defense Council (www.nrdc.org)National Wildlife Federation (www.nwf.org/)The Nature Conservancy (www.tnc.org)North American Association for Environmental Education (www.naaee.org)Organic Consumers Association (OrganicConsumers.org/)People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (www.peta-online.org/)Physicians for Social Responsibility (www.psr.org)Planned Parenthood Federation of America (www.plannedparenthood.org)Population Action International (www.populationaction.org)Rainforest Action Network (www.ran.org)Sierra Club (www.sierraclub.org)Tree-Sit (www.tree-sit.org)The Wilderness Society (www.tws.org)World Wildlife Fund (www.wwf.org)Worldwatch Institute (www.worldwatch.org)

Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected. Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

Read one of the case studies on pp. 171 (potato industry), 197 (Eastman Kodak), or 231 (airline industry). Prepare an analysis of the case and how its structure dictates its strategic position. Describe, analyze, and evaluate the case firms strategy. Case study , APA format, 3 pages, double spaced , 3 citation ( including the textbook) Texbook is : Economics for Managers Pearson Paul G. Farnham 3rd (2014) 978-013-277370-6

Instructions CRM 222 Research Paper Instructions and Rubric Students will write a 1500-1700-word Research Paper on the following topic Chemical, biological, nuclear, radiological, or explosive training drills or exercises Students will select and submit their paper topics to the Dropbox no later than 11:59 PM EST/EDT of Module 3. The paper will include the following: (1) An overview of the subject (2) Major relevant points relative to economic, social, and/or legal implications; or, the impacts due to the lack of attention paid to the economic, social, and/or legal implications (3) A discussion on how your subject relates to the Saint Leo core values of excellence and integrity. Examples of questions that you should ask yourself include: a. Is there a commitment by any of the members of the organizations to achieve excellence and live their mission while delivering on its promise? How so? b. Does anyone pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed? How do you know these things? c. What are the indicators of their integrity or lack of integrity? d. What can you take away from what you have learned? The paper must include a running head, page numbers, cover page, abstract, body, and reference page. References must be cited (in-text) using the APA format. A minimum of five references are required, with no more than two from Internet sources. Do not use Wikipedia references or similar type references in your paper. Additional grading criteria will include clarity of presentation, quality of content, mastery of content, care and attention to detail, organization, originality of presentation, and the value and interest of the presentation, as well as proper grammar and punctuation. The paper should consist of your original work. You are required to use no more than 15% of others quoted work when completing any assignments within this course of study. Your research paper must therefore be 85% original. Final papers are to be submitted to the Dropbox no later than Sunday 11:59 PM EST/EDT of Module 6. (This Dropbox basket is linked to Turnitin.) Your paper will be assessed using an individual grading rubric, which is on the next page for your reference. This tool and process helps students identify and the instructor measure the key points necessary to successfully complete written assignments. Important notes: Points will be deducted for non-APA formatted papers. APA format and style information is available via the course Resources section. All work must be completed using Microsoft Office products. Word Perfect and other similar products will not be accepted due to read and compatibility issues. Rich text files (.rtf) are also acceptable. No previously-submitted papers, articles, reports, or projects, in whole or in part, to Saint Leo University, or to any other university or college will be accepted. Violation of this will make you subject to referral to the Academic Standards Committee for self-plagiarism. Rubric (100 points possible): Students will complete the assignment with attention to the following criteria: Exceptional corresponds to an A- to A (90-100). Performance is outstanding; significantly above the usual expectations. Proficient corresponds to a grade of B- to B+ (80-89%). Skills and standards are at the level of expectation. Basic corresponds to a C to C+ (74-79%). Skills and standards are acceptable but improvements are needed to meet expectations well. Novice corresponds to a D to C- (60-73%). Performance is weak; the skills or standards are not sufficiently demonstrated at this time. Not Attempted corresponds to a grade of F (0-59%). This criterion is missing or not in evidence. Compute an analytic score by assigning points for each element, following the point ranges indicated below. Criteria Rating Score Not Attempted Novice Basic Proficient Exceptional Extensively develops the issue in relationship to the students approved topic. Paper shows depth and understanding of the subject with appropriate analysis (20 points) 0-11 12-14 15 16-18 18-20 ___/20 Clearly identifies focus and logically analyzes and discusses the topic (16 points) 0-9 10-11 12 13-14 15-16 ___/16 Meets acceptable college-level standards with respect to form and substance (16 points) 0-9 10-11 12 13-14 15-16 ___/16 Ideas presented in a clear and concise manner (16 points) 0-9 10-11 12 13-14 15-16 ___/16 APA style and format (16 points) 0-9 10-11 12 13-14 15-16 ___/16 Turnitin.com score <15% (16 points) 0-9 10-11 12 13-14 15-16 ___/16 Total Score: ____/100 Hide

Attached is two separate assignment please label them as Discussion 1 and Discussion 2 Discussion 1 What is hearsay? Discuss the development and need for the creation of the exceptions to the hearsay rule. instructions: Please answer the following question(s). Answers need to be thorough and complete – a minimum of 500 words. You may want to type your answer up in a Word document to check for this. Posts that are merely a few sentences long will not receive full credit. Please edit your posts for spelling and grammar mistakes. You must also demonstrate to me that you have read the text by incorporating facts and information from your weekly reading into the discussion. This is not an assignment that you can type up something off the top of your head. To receive full credit for this assignment, you must also post two additional response posts to two other students posts. Response posts need to be professional and courteous. Please make sure your response posts add something relevant and new to the conversation and furthers the discussion. All three discussion posts (original and response posts) must be in your own words. You are not allowed to copy and paste any of your discussions from any other source (ex: website, textbook, other student, etc.). If you use outside information, you must cite that information using APA citation style. Discussion 2 Describe the six categories of good parenting, as defined by Eve, Byrne, and Gagliardi (2014). Name one other category you could add to this list. Do you agree with these good parenting categories? Why or why not? Instructions: Please answer the following question(s). Answers need to be thorough and complete – a minimum of 500 words. You may want to type your answer up in a Word document to check for this. Posts that are merely a few sentences long will not receive full credit. Please edit your posts for spelling and grammar mistakes. You must also demonstrate to me that you have read the text by incorporating facts and information from your weekly reading into the discussion. This is not an assignment that you can type up something off the top of your head. To receive full credit for this assignment, you must also post two additional response posts to two other students posts. Response posts need to be professional and courteous. Please make sure your response posts add something relevant and new to the conversation and furthers the discussion. All three discussion posts (original and response posts) must be in your own words. You are not allowed to copy and paste any of your discussions from any other source (ex: website, textbook, other student, etc.). If you use outside information, you must cite that information using APA citation style. I know each discussion suppose to be 500 I will the additional words. Do at least 411 words for each discussion.
Hide

Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria: 1. Discuss financial factors that influence health care today. 2. Include funding sources 3. Include reimbursement methods 4. Include economic factors 5. Include business influences 6. Include cost containment and the role of the nurse 7. Some questions to consider when writing the paper: a. Is there a relationship between socioeconomic status and health/health outcomes? b. Is health care a right or a privilege? c. Is the Affordable Care Act the answer for Americans? d. What is the fiscal responsibility in the role of the nurse today? e. In an ideal world, what would your health care vision for America look like? 8. The scholarly paper should be in narrative format, 3 to 5 pages excluding the title and reference page. 9. Include an introductory paragraph, purpose statement, and a conclusion. 10. Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the paper. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use we or I) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify: I, we, you, me, our may not be used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used. 12. Include a minimum of three (3) professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal references to support the paper (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old. 13. APA format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations).
Hide