MIN of 6 CREDIBLE Sources (you can use government or scholarly journal articles). YOUR TEXTBOOK DOES NOT COUNT AS A SOURCE
Follow proper writing guidelines: introduction with a clearly defined thesis statement, fully developed paragraphs, conclusion, in-text and reference page citations (APA format), etc.
Do NOT use the first-person
Use subheading to divide the main points of your paper
Do not use long quotes, lists, or bullet points. You need to synthesize the material into your paper.
All opinions/arguments must supported by credible facts.
APA format (abstract is not required): unless otherwise noted, include a title page, in-text and reference page citations, running head, page numbers, etc.
Must be in a Word document form (.doc or .docx)

The use of applicant tracking systems in recruitment and selection. Use 1.5 line spacing, 2.5 cm margins on top, bottom and each side, Arial font size 12. Do not include an executive summary, abstract, footnotes or endnotes. NO textbooks, newspapers, industry or popular press (e.g., Business Review Weekly, HR Monthly), web-based or other external (non-refereed) material in this scholarly literature review.

Final Analysis of a Selected Test This assignment is a culmination of the previous assignments you have completed during this course. In this assignment, you will synthesize your previous research as well as conduct research on the final element in the Code, Element 9. Element 9 states that a test user, “evaluate(s) the available evidence on the performance of test takers of diverse subgroups . . . determine(s) to the extent feasible which performance differences may have been caused by factors unrelated to the skills being assessed.” Together, the previous course assignments and this current one involving Element 9 will provide you with the data, research, and literature reviews across all nine elements of the Code to assist your decision-making process about the appropriate selection of a test. For this final assignment: Locate reviews or research related to how Element 9 applies to your selected test. If the research or reviews do not address this element in any way, then you will need to cite the references you reviewed and note that they were lacking in in addressing this element, drawing appropriate conclusions for when a test is lacking such evidence. Synthesize all of the data and information you gathered on your selected test throughout the course and identify highlights, both positive and negative, both advantages and disadvantages, according to all nine elements of the Code. See the link in the resources about the Meaning of Synthesis. Evaluate your selected test based on these data and draw a conclusion about whether it is a test that you would select, recommend, or even defend, if necessary in practice. Note: You should not merely copy and paste your earlier assignments for the final paper. Instead you will be synthesizing the research you completed for each element into a summary of that element that you will offer in support of your final evaluation. (For example, note that the technical quality element (that is, Element 5) will be only a synthesis and evaluation and not a repeat of the annotated bibliography you completed in Unit 5.) Identify the strengths or weaknesses for each element, and determine if the information about that element supports (or opposes) the use of your selected test in the field and population to be served. Incorporate recommendations about ways to improve the selected test. Review all of your evaluations for each element and recommended improvements to the test, and write an overall evaluation and determination about the use of your selected test. Would you recommend this test to a school district or business that you are employed as a consultant? Would you be able to defend the use of this test in a court proceeding? Organize your paper using the following headings: Title page (required). (One page.) Abstract (required). (One page.) The Code of Fair Testing Practices in Education. (A minimum of four pages. For each element, identify strengths and weaknesses, evaluate the selected test for the element, and make recommendations, if any for improvement, citing appropriate standards of practice.) Element 1. Purpose: Define the purpose for testing, the content, and skills tested. (See Unit 2 assignment.) Element 2. Appropriateness: Evaluate appropriateness of test content, skills tested, and content covered. (See Unit 2 assignment.) Element 3. Materials: Evaluate materials for which clear, accurate, and complete information is provided. (See Unit 2 assignment.) Element 4. Training: Test users have appropriate knowledge, skills, and training. (See Unit 2 assignment.) Element 5. Technical Quality: Synthesis of evidence of reliability. (See Unit 5 assignment.) Synthesis of evidence of validity. (See Unit 5 assignment.) Element 6. Test Items and Format: Evaluate test items, test format, directions, manuals and scores, and address the use of computer technology. (See Unit 7 assignment.) Element 7. Test Procedures and Materials: Evaluate test procedures and materials to ensure that potentially offensive content or language is avoided. (See Unit 7 assignment.) Element 8. Modifications and Accommodations: Evaluate if tests provide appropriately modified forms or procedures for test takers with disabilities. (See Unit 7 assignment.) Element 9. Group Differences: Evaluate evidence on performance of test takers of diverse subgroups. Summary. (Two pages.) Overall recommendation to use the selected test in the field and with populations to be served. If recommending the use of the selected test, identify the greatest strengths you discovered and determined in its use. Additionally, identify any limitations or concerns that may still exist with its use regardless of the recommendation. Are there still concerns for the test in certain situations? If not recommending the use of the selected test, identify the greatest weaknesses you discovered and determined in its use. Additionally, identify any strengths that may still exist with its use regardless of the opposition. Are there still uses for the test within set parameters? References (required, use current APA format and style). Additional Requirements Your paper should meet the following requirements: References: A minimum of nine references. These may include journal articles, literature reviews, MMY reviews, and publisher websites. At least five of the nine references must be from professional journals. It is likely and appropriate that many of these references and citations were included in one or more of your previous assignments. Alternatively, you may want to supplement your paper with current, peer-viewed journal articles you located after completing an earlier assignment. Those inclusions would also be acceptable. Length of paper: At least six pages (not including title page, abstract, or references). Note: The articles you need to complete this assignment should be available inside the library collection. In future courses, you may use the Capella library’s Interlibrary Loan service to obtain articles outside of the collection, but you should not have to use the service for this course. In the event that you cannot find articles covering a newer test edition, please refer to the List of Tests by Type document in the resources. Note which tests have been designated as acceptable for searching prior test editions. Reference Joint Committee on Testing Practices. (2004). Code of fair testing practices in education. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/science/programs/testing/fair-testing.pdf
Hide

General Instructions
7 pages double spaced, Times New Roman size 12 font, 1 inch margins
o not including title page and references
o Have a fun title!
Have a clear thesis statement that is explicit
o This paper will argue
Identify your theoretical perspective within your introduction
o Do not have me guessing what your argument is, and what theoretical perspective you are using
Have solid, empirical evidence when making any claims
Ensure you are citing all your sources properly
o Whatever citation style you use make sure you are consistent, and using a citation guide
o Have a properly formatted references page
Include 4-5 academic sources that is not pulled from course readings
o Please try and avoid citing the lectures, but rather go directly to the source itself
o Make sure you are using credible sources

Focused Scope
The first section of your paper
o Define your sub-system (you should identify the key concepts, threats, rules and key actors)
o What are the challenges of your sub-system?
o Set the stage for your paper with your introduction including why the topic is important, and the purpose of your paper
The second section
o Assess the effectiveness of your chosen sub-system by focusing on a specific actor, or organization
o You are to utilize strictly empirical evidence in this section to argue your position
o Ex. Focus on the WHO and its work within the global health system
The third section
o Explain the level of effectiveness or ineffectiveness from a theoretical perspective
o Identify what theoretical perspective you are using, and define its key assumptions and inclinations in general terms
o Analyze the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the sub-system from your chosen theoretical perspective

This is a 3 part weekly assignment. The 1st part requires you to write an essay about the provided topic. The 2nd part requires you to respond to two peers postings. The assignment will be extended after each deadline.

Discussion Post Requirements:
350-500 words in length with proper punctuation, capitalization, and grammar.
Include supportive evidence, such as direct applicable experience and expert sources.
Due no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm, CT

Responses to peer posts:
Respond to two peers, minimum (you are expected to continue to engage with peers and instructor beyond these two responses)
Initial Peer responses due Friday, 11:59 pm, CT
Remain engaged in the discussion through Sunday, 11:59 pm, CT

Discussion Topic
How has this course most contributed toward your continuing career development? How have you employed critical thinking and ethical reasoning in the course activities? What words of learning and/or wisdom related to the course outcomes might you leave with your colleagues in this class? Please explain your responses. Then, in your response to others, comment on their findings and share insights that might further their thought on these three topics as well as your own.

In-text citations and references are not required.

Describe a topic, idea, or concept you find so engaging that it makes you lose all track of time. Why does it captivate you?

After collecting enough information about the target during Deliverable 2 (Reconnaissance and Scanning Plan), you will describe how to use that information to gain access to Haverbrook’s systems. Your one- to two-page plan on gaining access should include:• details of the gaining access process in regards to the techniques commonly used to exploit low-privileged user accounts by cracking passwords through techniques such as brute-forcing, password guessing, and social engineering, and then escalate the account privileges to administrative levels, to perform a protected operation.• an implementation outline of any software that will be used in gaining access to the network(s) or system(s) You may include open source and commercial tools available to execute the actual exploit: Burp Suite, Cain and Abel, Core Impact, John the Ripper, Metasploit, and others. You can also use some programming languages, such as Javascript, Perl, Python, Ruby, or C++, if you choose to develop custom exploits.As you are developing the Gaining Access Plan, keep these questions in mind:• How would you escalate your privileges?• How would you establish a command and control communication channel?Refer to Chapter 6 in the textbook for the different techniques that can be used to gain access to the system.

4 pages; Times New Roman; 12 point font; double spaced; MLA format; WORD doc. Phil Spector was an important producer who created an original sound and recording style. Your task is to first, list and describe some of the techniques that Spector developed, and how they affected the sound of his recordings. Then, from the list below choose two songs produced by Phil Spector, and describe how they reflect his stylistic traits. Please include a short history about the songs and Phil Spector as well. Grading Written Assignments will be evaluated on format, originality, organization, content, and grammar. The chapter material, videos and recordings should be your main source, but you may need to do some research to submit a quality assignment. It is necessary to document direct quotations or paraphrasing obtained from the text, recordings, or video sources (parenthetical documentation MLA). You must include a works cited page at the end of your written assignment as well. NOTE: Songs with text that are sung should be in quotation marks and compositions or works that are solely instrumental should be italicized. Songs: The Crystals, “Then He Kissed Me” The Righteous Brothers, “You’ve Lost That Lovin’ Feelin'” The Ronettes, “Baby I Love You” Ike & Tina Turner, “River Deep – Mountain High”
Hide

through independent research, write a documented essay in MLA format that determines the social message, social relevance, and cultural context of Walter Rodney (Guyanese activist) .

Instructions:The NYPD has been criticized recently for its ‘stop and frisk’ program; should individual NYPD officers have taken it on themselves to resist orders PRIOR to a court decision?See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop-and-frisk_in_New_York_City (Links to an external site.)Answer this question in 600-1200 words, drawing explicitly on the course readings. Contrast Weber against Thompson and write what you think the officer should have done in that situation. In my view, I like Thompson’s argument better.