writing-help

Data mining is becoming more prevalent in healthcare organizations. Write a paper discussing current data mining trends in healthcare and what the future brings for data mining related to healthcare. At least 4 sources.

This paper must be no less than 1,000 words and should demonstrate a thorough awareness of the topic as well as the ability to engage in philosophical reasoning. The Assignment: Kayla and Jared are college sophomores who sometimes have casual sex. They have affection for each other, but neither is interested in a relationship. They always use condoms, but apparently one broke, because Kayla discovers she is 6 weeks pregnant. Kayla has not had sex with anyone besides Jared in the past 3 months, so it is certain that he is the father. Neither Kayla nor Jared is financially independent, and neither feels emotionally ready to be parents. However, they care about behaving morally, and feel like they should think carefully before deciding what to do next. They also feel that they share responsibility for the pregnancy, and so they should decide together what to do about it. The problem is, Kayla and Jared espouse different moral theories. In this paper, youll consider the conflict this creates and explain what advice you would give Kayla and Jared. Part I Kaylas Argument: Choose a moral theory for Kayla (natural law theory, Kantianism, utilitarianism, contractarianism, or virtue theory). Explain what options are open to Kayla with regard to her pregnancy, as a proponent of this theory. (In this section, you will be evaluated based on your ability to apply the tenets of the theory to this applied bioethical issue. Reference to specific theorists and concepts we have studies will strengthen your paper). Part II Jareds Argument: Now choose a moral theory for Jared (natural law theory, Kantianism, utilitarianism, contractarianism, or virtue theory, but not the same theory as Kayla), and explain why the theory he espouses leads him to see different options as available to him with regard to the pregnancy. (In this section, you will be evaluated based on your ability to apply the tenets of the theory to this applied bioethical issue. Reference to specific theorists and concepts we have studied will strengthen your paper). Part III Your Argument: Since Kayla and Jared dont agree, they ask you to tell them what you would do in their situation. Give your own arguments to support your view. (In this section, you will be evaluated based on your ability to clearly articulate moral arguments in support of your position. Note: you are not helping Kayla and Jared come to a compromise, you are simply telling them what you would do if you were in their shoes). *References not required.
Hide

These minipapers should augment, enhance, build on, expand (etc.) the material in our text. The papers should be “semi-scholarly” and should have a reference to the text and at least one source (text, journal article) outside of the text (many students use more sources). Don’t use the minipaper as an opportunity to present a personal opinion, your paper must reflect solid, published opinions and principles. The text referred to in the instructions is Project Management: A Strategic Managerial Approach (10th ed) by Jack R. Meredith, Scott M. Shafer and Samuel J. Mantel Jr. Paper should be in APA format with reference page included.

What ought to be the proper role of Congress in Strategic Intelligence? Is there a proper role in oversight of strategic intelligence activities, in ensuring that the policy expressed in budget and appropriations laws is being followed, in ensuring that the will of the people and the necessity of national security is being carried out properly by the executive branch of government? OR: Describe and explain the Church Committee hearings in the 1970s. What impact did it have on the U.S. Intelligence Community? If you choose this topic, here is one reference to consider: Schwarz, Frederick A. O. 2007. The Church Committee and a New Era of Intelligence Oversight. Intelligence and National Security 22 (2): 270-97. https://doi-org.ezproxy2.apus.edu/10.1080/02684520701303881 OR: Congressional investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election created significant issues and controversies. House and Senate investigations seemed to come to different conclusions. Develop and analyze the main issues with these investigations, what went wrong, and what can be done to improve such oversight activities of the IC in the future. Please follow the below requirements: General Requirements 1. Document Format. a. MS Word document b. One-inch (1) margins (double-spaced) c. Times New Roman Font d. Twelve (12) pitch 2. Citation Format: The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017 available online at: https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html The Author-Date system is recommended. 3. Graphics are allowed and encouraged (but they dont count on length). 4. Students must (1) employ imaginative approaches to answer the question being asked; (2) display an impressive command of the subject matter beyond the immediately obvious; (3) demonstrate a high level of critical thinking and reflecting on current and world views, and genuine intellectual development; and (4) excel in explaining all major points using multiple examples from the course readings or individual research. Here is my outline: Research Paper Proposal Format-Due Week 3/Paper Due Week 7 Name: Willie Leatherwood Title: The Attack on Pearl Harbor: Could It Have Been Avoided? Course Objective Link: Your topic must be much narrower than these objectives. They just need to fall under one of these large subject areas. The topic of my paper is directly related to the CO below (Place an X): _______CO-1: Deconstruct the flow of intelligence to support strategic decision making at the White House, Congress, and the executive departments and agencies. ___X____CO-2: Assess the challenges and role facing strategic intelligence analysis and strategic counterintelligence. _______CO-3: Critique the elements, methods, processes, and capabilities of strategic covert action. CO-4: The role of congress is explored during your Mid-term Paper and should not be explored during this paper. _______CO-5: Differentiate the fundamental capabilities and limitations of strategic intelligence collection. Thesis Statement: The attack on Pearl Harbor to initiate the involvement of the United States in World War II was one of intelligence failure. In this essay we explore how it could have been avoided and if that was even possible. Outline: Main points you will discuss in your paper. 1. Introduction. The attack on Pearl Harbor to initiate the involvement of the United States in World War II was one of intelligence failure. In this essay we explore how it could have been avoided and if that was even possible. 2. Knowledge of Attack? a. Clues b. Crumbling Relations and Japanese Propaganda c. Joseph Grew 3. Precursors to the U.S.-Japan Conflict a. Tensions over interest in China b. Japans alliance with Italy and Germany c. US embargo on oil and iron ore in China 4. The Attack a. United States underestimating Japan b. President Roosevelt and Prince Konoye/embargo lift c. Possible other scenarios 5. Conclusion. Perhaps if the United States had heeded warnings coming from Japan, they could have gathered more intelligence and gauged the situation better to avoid an attack, or was it unavoidable? FIVE REFERENCES: Gillon, Steven M. Pearl Harbor FDR Leads the Nation into War New York: Basic Books, 2011. Clausen, Henry C., and Lee, Bruce. Pearl Harbor?: Final Judgement 1st ed. New York: Crown, 1992. Pearl Harbor. Cassell, 2009. https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/brewermod/pearl_harbor/0. Warner, Denis. Could Pearl Harbor Have Been Averted?: The New York Times, 1998. Zimm, Alan. Attack On Pearl Harbor: Strategy Combat, Myths, Deceptions. Casemate, 2011.
Hide

1. Choose a developmental area (Physical, cognitive, and/or language). 2. Create a developmentally appropriate activity (short – description of an activity) for a group of two-year olds. 3. Explain how this activity is appropriate in relation to Piagets stages of cognitive development and Vygotskys sociocultural theory.

Write a 550-word paper defining the roles and functions of group leaders. Explain how the dynamics change in the different stages of the groups or functions within the group process. Use at least one scholarly resource to support your writing.

Please read World War Z , write an essay (choosing one of the prompts below), and a reflection (all of the prompts below). Essay prompts: – Choose three experiences from the text and explore the human reaction to fear. Examine a variety of perspectives and consider how reactions might change based on family, priorities, culture, etc – Examine the experiences in “Warnings” and “Blame.” Looking at their pre-zombie outbreak occupations, choose several of the narratives in the opening two sections and analyze why they chose to report or not report their findings. Reflection prompts: – What connections do you see in the world of today and the world of the text? – What was your process for reading World War Z and what note taking strategy did you employ to remember the important details? – Go back to The Lathe of Heaven and think about how the population responded to an exterior threat. Why do you think authors use this device in their plots?

Write a 2 to 3 page paper based on your experience in which you make a claim about how much your self is influenced by when and where you were born and what value you see in “examining” these features of yourself. Specifically, imagine that you encounter someone like Socrates and he asks you if you’ve critically examined your beliefs and practices. Have you done so? Is there a value in critically examining your life and beliefs? Would all of it survive scrutiny? Are there beliefs you don’t want to subject to philosophical inquiry?Please don’t describe every thought you had; but please do reference insightful moments during your contemplation.IV. Your audience is a general reader.V. Your shared context is the experience of rumination. For example, your first sentence might be something like “After taking 30 minutes to think about…”VI. The problems you are addressing are “Is much of my self greatly influenced by the time and place I was born? And what value is there in critically examining my self and my beliefs?” You can include a sentence much like this after your shared context in order to motivate your paper.VII. Your thesis is yours to design but it should address the problem you described in the previous sentences. The thesis should be the last sentence of your first paragraph. Your thesis will look something like this: “Much/little of who I am is dictated by when and where I was born…especially x and y. While I haven’t critically examined all my beliefs, I do/don’t think there is value in doing so.”Like all assignments, please follow the formatting guidelines listed on the syllabus. This paper will need to be typed and submitted here as a docx or PDF format. I am interested to see how you argue for a thesis and use reasoning and evidence in support of your thesis. Clarity and good reasoning are top priorities: I’m not looking for writing “tricks”, big words, or things intended to impress a reader. This reader is only impressed by clarity in thought, clarity in writing, and good claims supported by good reasons and evidence.

Purpose of AssignmentThe purpose of this assignment is for students to synthesize the concepts learned throughout the course. This assignment will provide students an opportunity to build critical thinking skills, develop businesses and organizations, and solve problems requiring data by compiling all pertinent information into one report.Resources: Microsoft Excel®, Signature Assignment Databases, Signature Assignment Options, Part 3: Inferential StatisticsScenario: Upon successful completion of the MBA program, imagine you work in the analytics department for a consulting company. Your assignment is to analyze one of the following databases:ManufacturingHospitalConsumer FoodFinancialSelect one of the databases based on the information in the Signature Assignment Options.Provide a 1,600-word detailed, four-part, statistical report with the following sections:Part 1 – Preliminary AnalysisPart 2 – Examination of Descriptive StatisticsPart 3 – Examination of Inferential StatisticsPart 4 – Conclusion/RecommendationsPart 1 – Preliminary AnalysisGenerally, as a statistics consultant, you will be given a problem and data. At times, you may have to gather additional data. For this assignment, assume all the data is already gathered for you.State the objective:What are the questions you are trying to address?Describe the population in the study clearly and in sufficient detail:What is the sample?Discuss the types of data and variables:Are the data quantitative or qualitative?What are the levels of measurement for the data?Part 2 – Descriptive StatisticsExamine the given data.Present the descriptive statistics (mean, median, mode, range, standard deviation, variance, CV, and five-number summary).Identify any outliers in the data.Present any graphs or charts you think are appropriate for the data.Note: Ideally, we want to assess the conditions of normality too. However, for the purpose of this exercise, assume data is drawn from normal populations.Part 3 – Inferential StatisticsUse the Part 3: Inferential Statistics document.Create (formulate) hypothesesRun formal hypothesis testsMake decisions. Your decisions should be stated in non-technical terms.Hint: A final conclusion saying “reject the null hypothesis” by itself without explanation is basically worthless to those who hired you. Similarly, stating the conclusion is false or rejected is not sufficient.Part 4 – Conclusion and RecommendationsInclude the following:What are your conclusions?What do you infer from the statistical analysis?State the interpretations in non-technical terms. What information might lead to a different conclusion?Are there any variables missing?What additional information would be valuable to help draw a more certain conclusion?

What strategies would you recommend your employer implement to improve staff nurse recruitment and retention? Why would these strategies be effective? Submission Instructions: Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources