Do a deep dive analysis for Taco Bell Australia using “Threat of new entrants” (one of the element from porter’s five forces), and based on the analysis and argument, put a findings and recommendation at the end.
In 4000 words Critique a completed improvement project that you have been involved in, or which is well-documented in your organisation. Briefly describe the project and its outcomes (documentation may be attached as an appendix and compare and contrast it with what you have encountered on this unit (thinking, approach, tools and techniques)). The emphasis should be on reflective learning and critique. What went well or badly? How might things have been done differently?
Rubric for Rough Drafts (1-3)40 pointsFor each unit (Deviant Bodies), you will write a 3-page draft. For your final paper, you will further develop and revise one of these drafts. AssignmentThe 3-page rough draft should be written in MLA format and do the following:1.Present a thesis that counters or furthers a claim made by a critic from the corresponding unit. The theme needs to be connected to the concept of monsters, monstrosity, or monstrousness. 2.Your response must focus more on your thesis than on agreeing with the critic. Your content needs to be original. 3.The language should be formal, concise, and precise. The paper should be relatively clean of mechanical issues. 4.The paper should be 3 pages long. ?The critical work from the unit to which the writer is responding and a compelling thesis are identified within the first two paragraphs. 10 pointso9-10 points = The first two paragraphs make clear which argument from a critical work from the unit is being either countered or extended by presenting a clear thesis. The author and title of the critical work are identified in the first couple paragraphs. The thesis ismonster-themed and refers to a primary work from the class. o8 points The first two paragraphs present a thesis that counters or extends an argument from one of the critical works, but it does not clearly refer to the critic or to the critics work. o7 points The first two paragraphs present a thesis that simply reinforces the argument of a critic from the unit. o6 points The first two paragraphs misrepresent the critics argument. oLess than 6 points No reference to any critical work can be found in the first two paragraphs. ?The writers response is original meaning the writer does not simply agree with the critic, but either extends or counters the critics argument. 10 pointso9-10 points = Writer takes an claim relevant to our monster-themed class from the critical work and either compellingly counters the claim or furthers it by adding new support, or by applying to a different monster that we studied in this course. o8 points = Writer either counters or extends a claim relevant to our monster-themed class from the critical work, but the claim lacks originality or is not compelling. A lack of originality includes too muchsummarizing or too much time simply agreeing with the claims made in the critical work. o7 points = Writer either counters or extends a claim relevant to our monster-themed class from the critical work but misrepresents the critical work or the writer summarizes the critical work accurately, but fails to extend or counter a claim within it. o6 points = Writer fails to extend or counter a claim relevant to our monster-themed class within the work and misrepresents it. o0-5 points = Writer does not follow directions from the prompt and appears to be inadequately familiar with both the primary work and the critical work.?The papers grammar and mechanics does not impede the readers general understanding of the content. 10 pointso9-10 points the paper contains only a few minor grammatical and mechanical errors, none of which interfere with the papers meaning. o8 points the paper contains many grammatical and mechanical errors, none of which interfere with the papers meaning. o7 points the paper contains many grammatical and mechanical errors and at times the papers meaning is consequently unclear. o6 points the papers meaning is often unclear because of frequent grammatical and mechanical errors.
Write a short answer on the following situation. Conduct an informal, open-ended Interview for about 15 minutes with someone who works full time as a waiter or waitress at a sit-down restaurant about emotion work. Do not use that term. Instead ask about specificsdo they have to act nice, say pleasant things, smile when dealing with people who are difficult or rude, and so forth? Try to get a sense of how they deal with unpleasant customers, the pressure on them from management, or tips to be nice and friendly. Have them recount specific instances or tell stories. Ask whether there is a gap between how they really feel and how they must act on the job. Do they hide their true emotions and feelings as part of the job? Have they ever let their true feelings show when they should not have?
This assignment is designed to assess the following Student Learning Outcome:Critically compare and contrast opposing claims regarding the same fact or hypothesis, when the various sides are credible according to discipline-specific indicators of authority.This essay assignment (2-3 pages) is intended to foster your information and data literacy by asking you to compare and contrast an author’s argument about an historical figure or trend that differs from prior interpretations and assumptions discuss in Spring, J. (2018). The American school, a global context: From the Puritans to the Trump Era. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. It is important to also reflect on whether the author’s argument might challenge your own conceptions of the past.You must choose one of the following articles below:Harlan, L. R. (1971). The secret life of Booker T. Washington. The Journal of Southern History, 37(3), 393-416Preview the document.Vinovskis, M. A. (1992). Schooling and poor children in 19th-century America. American Behavior Scientist 35 (3), pp. 313-331.Preview the documentTolley, K. (1996). Science for ladies, classics for gentlemen: A comparative analysis of scientific subjects in the curricula of boys’ and girls’ secondary schools in the United States, 1794-1850. History of Education Quarterly 36(2), 129-153.Preview the documentA successfully written paper will require you to:Conduct a close reading of the article, keep detailed notes on the author’s thesis, and sources of evidence. For example, you should note what types of evidence is provided and from what types of sources (primary sources).You also must compare and contrast the author’s claims with others found in the textbook. How does the author’s argument challenge other scholarly views? How does the authors’ argument challenge your own perceptions of the past?Evaluate the creditability of the sources used by the author. Do these sources directly or indirectly support the author’s claim? Is the evidence factual or speculative? Does the evidence support other interpretations?Take a position on the author’s claim based on your evaluation of evidence and your interpretation of the evidence.It may be helpful to formulate your own argument (thesis statement) before drafting your paper. However, if you find writing up a draft first helps you organize your ideas and critique, make sure you formulate your thesis and rework the draft so the reader clearly understands your position.Information and data literacy skills will also be required of your term paper, so this is a great opportunity for your instructor to provide you with feedback on your growth in this area.Download/Preview the rubric for this assignment.Preview the document
Reaction PaperThis assignment is designed to assess the following Student Learning Outcome:Critically compare and contrast opposing claims regarding the same fact or hypothesis, when the various sides are credible according to discipline-specific indicators of authority.This essay assignment (2-3 pages) is intended to foster your information and data literacy by asking you to compare and contrast an author’s argument about an historical figure or trend that differs from prior interpretations and assumptions discuss in Spring, J. (2018). The American school, a global context: From the Puritans to the Trump Era. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. It is important to also reflect on whether the author’s argument might challenge your own conceptions of the past.You must choose one of the following articles below:Harlan, L. R. (1971). The secret life of Booker T. Washington. The Journal of Southern History, 37(3), 393-416Preview the document.Vinovskis, M. A. (1992). Schooling and poor children in 19th-century America. American Behavior Scientist 35 (3), pp. 313-331.Preview the documentTolley, K. (1996). Science for ladies, classics for gentlemen: A comparative analysis of scientific subjects in the curricula of boys’ and girls’ secondary schools in the United States, 1794-1850. History of Education Quarterly 36(2), 129-153.Preview the documentA successfully written paper will require you to:Conduct a close reading of the article, keep detailed notes on the author’s thesis, and sources of evidence. For example, you should note what types of evidence is provided and from what types of sources (primary sources).You also must compare and contrast the author’s claims with others found in the textbook. How does the author’s argument challenge other scholarly views? How does the authors’ argument challenge your own perceptions of the past?Evaluate the creditability of the sources used by the author. Do these sources directly or indirectly support the author’s claim? Is the evidence factual or speculative? Does the evidence support other interpretations?Take a position on the author’s claim based on your evaluation of evidence and your interpretation of the evidence.It may be helpful to formulate your own argument (thesis statement) before drafting your paper. However, if you find writing up a draft first helps you organize your ideas and critique, make sure you formulate your thesis and rework the draft so the reader clearly understands your position.Information and data literacy skills will also be required of your term paper, so this is a great opportunity for your instructor to provide you with feedback on your growth in this area.
As a leader in your CAPSIM corporation (Andrews), you have been asked to review the proposed corporate policies (see the Corporate Policies PDF). Explain what you believe the intent of the policy is (what would the company want to accomplish with the policy). Then, provide your feedback to each policy if you agree or disagree with the policy and a brief explanation as to why you made this determination. You can use the following: How to write HR policies:https://www.writing-skills.com/how-to-write-hr-policies/ How to write HR policies – Emphasis. (2011, February 14). Retrieved July 14, 2015. Bad Customer Service? Blame the Bosses’ Bad Policies: https://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/05/25/bad-customer-service-blame-the-bosses-bad-policies/ Bad Customer Service? Blame the Bosses’ Bad Policies – DailyFinance. (n.d.). Retrieved July 14, 2015, from https://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/05/25/bad-customer-service-blame-the-bosses-bad-policies/ Video
Frederic Henry’s perspective and attitude about war changes drastically in this story by Hemingway. How and why does Henry’s change happen? Write a reflective essay in which you explain Henry’s change in thinking about war and connect this to a personal experience where you underwent a significant change of perspective, how and why this change happened, and how this benefited your life. The essay’s thesis statement and body contents should refer to A Farewell to Arms and clearly state the connection. The conclusion should refer back to A Farewell to Arms too. Note: Henry’s change in perspective about war has nothing to do with Catherine or romance! Thesis statement: Your introduction’s thesis statement must include story title and author (A Farewell to Arms by Hemingway), the controlling ideas of Henry’s change and your change, and why this is important. Do not use announcements such as “In this essay…”. The essay should be 1 typed page in length and include essay structure with an introduction, body and conclusion paragraphs. Proofread and edit carefully for correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
Hide