Writing Help

Identify a recent inquiry or review (past 3 years or current) undertaken by either the NSW or the Federal government. Review between four and six submissions to the Inquiry and write a 2,000 word review that: 1. Presents the details about the Inquiry, including its origin and the committee which is implementing it; its timeframe and purpose. This will serve as the introduction to the assignment. [A copy of the Terms of Reference should be attached to the submission and will not be included in the word count’] (approximately 500 words) 2. Describes each of the submissions being reviewed including the person/agency who submitted it, the main terms of reference they have addressed and the general argument they have made (approximately 250 words each) 3. Discusses the nature of the submissions, with reference to the values they represent and the kind of welfare system they suggest, including the implications for workers that are specifically stated or are indicated. This should incorporate relevant literature. (approximately 500 words)
Hide

History 101/Fall 2019 Professor Swiontek Paper Assignment Read Manisha Sinha, To Cast Just Obliquy on Oppressors: Black Radicalism in the Age of Revolution, William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 64, No. 1, (Jan. 2007), 149-160. Complete and submit to Canvas the graphic organizer for the Sinha article. Complete and submit to Canvas the graphic organizer for your primary source (see below). Read Chapter 12 in Eric Foner’s Give Me Liberty! Choose one of the following primary sources: David Walker’s Appeal to the Colored Citizens of the World (excerpt) (1829) Maria Stewart, on women workers, Lecture Delivered at the Franklin Hall, Boston, September 21, 1831,” (1831) Maria Stewart, Why Sit Ye Here and Die? Lecture delivered at Franklin Hall, September, 1832. (1832) Frederick Douglass, The Meaning of July Fourth for the Negro, Speech on July 5, 1852, Rochester, New York (1852) Main essay question: How does your primary source support or contradict Sinhas argument that black abolitionists created a radical, dissenting ideology in their fight against slavery? In answering the above question, analyze your primary source by responding to the questions below: (See also this graphic organizer.) What is the title of the source? What kind of source is it? (newspaper, diary entry, letter, etc.) Who is the author? How does the author’s gender, race, socioeconomic class, and citizenship status compare to the people about whom he or she is writing? Why did he or she write the source? Who was the intended audience? What unspoken assumptions does the text contain? Are there detectable biases in the source? When was the source written? What is the historical context in which the source was written and read? What larger historical events, processes, or structures might have influenced this text? Is this source consistent with what you know about the historical record from that time? Why or why not? Does the author have a main argument? If so, what is it? What other documents help you to understand this one? Or, what other information might you need to understand fully this document? How does this source enrich your understanding of the era? IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not simply list answers to the questions above. Rather, you must write your paper in essay form. It should have an introduction, several body paragraphs, and a conclusion. You do not need to address the questions in order, but be sure that you address all questions that are relevant to the source in your essay. Your essay must be a polished piece of writing. Length: 4-6 pages (1,000-1,500 words) Format: Typed, double-spaced, standard 12-point font, page numbers, footnotes or endnotes following the Chicago Manual of Style. You must include your name, paper title, and word count. Due: To Canvas and Turnitin.com by 11:00 pm on due date (see syllabus for specific date). Hard copies will not be accepted. Papers turned in after these times will be considered late and will not be graded. Computer problems and other technical issues will not be accepted as excuses. Essay value: 230 points Please note: Essays not submitted to Canvas and Turnitin.com will receive a 0. Essays in which plagiarism is detected and those without citations will also receive a 0. Essays with citations not following the Chicago Manual of Style (i.e., parenthetical citations) will receive no higher than a D. Your paper will be evaluated on the following criteria: Visiting a Writing Tutor at the LRC (10 points) — Submit the tutoring receipt on the day that your paper is due. You may see a tutor at any point in the writing process. If you are involved in another program on campus that provides tutoring (e.g. EOPS), a note from that tutor would also count. NOTE: You will *not* receive credit if you visit the writing tutor the day the paper is due. Please plan ahead. If at all possible, make an appointment at the Writing Center. You can receive 10 points extra credit if you visit the Writing Tutor before the day the rough draft is due in class. NOTE: This is some of the only extra credit available in the class. To receive credit, you must bring the yellow receipt to class the day the paper is due. To receive extra credit, you must bring the yellow receipt to class the day of the rough draft workshop. I will not accept late receipts; I will not go through the receipts forwarded to me by the Writing Center to find your tutoring receipt if you forget or lose it. Rough draft (20 points) — You must bring a rough draft (minimum of 3 pages) to class on the day of the paper writing workshop. If you do not have a rough draft in class or if your rough draft is shorter than 3 full pages, you will not receive any points. If you miss the Rough Draft class, you lose these pointsunless you have a documented medical or family emergency. Emailed rough drafts will not be accepted. *************** Format/Layout (word count, margins, etc.) (10 points) Papers that do not follow the format requirement will be penalized. Read the directions on this handout. Proper References in Chicago Style (10 points) You must use footnotes following the Chicago Manual of Style. You must cite whenever you quote directly, paraphrase information or ideas, or use facts. Papers with parenthetical citations will receive a D. Papers without any citations (or only 1 or 2 footnotes) will receive a zero (0). Thesis Statement/Argument (40 points) You must have a cogent, argumentative thesis statement that directly answers the question. It should appear at the end of the introduction. It is not enough simply to have a thesis statement; to receive full credit, you must write a good thesis statement. Use of Sources (40 points) You must have at least three paraphrased citations from the textbook (Foner) one citation from lecture at least two direct quotes from your primary source two citations from the Sinha article You must use evidence from all four kinds of sources to support your argument. This score will be based on both quantity of citations and quality of source usage. Analysis/Content/Critical Thinking (60 points) I am primarily interested in your ideas, argument, and analysis. Remember, historians form opinions based on evidence. Quality of Writing (20 points) You must write in grammatically correct English. Papers with excessive type-os or extremely poor grammar will be penalized. Proofread! Run spell-check! Organization and Structure (20 points) Poor organization and structure can interfere with the readers ability to understand your argument. Pay attention to how you organize your paper.
Hide

Major Report Sustainability, sustainable tourism and planning are the keys to a prosperous and long-term future for towns and cities, nations and the world as a whole. In this assignment you are asked to engage with the trending topic of “overtourism”. In our introduction to this course we will consider terms such as sustainability, sustainable development, sustainable tourism and tourism’s contributions to more sustainable futures. You are asked to research and engage with the concerns destinations, communities and tourism policy-makers have with issues of overtourism. In the course, we will discuss possible approaches to this assignment. This report document should be written as a formal report and should be well-presented, proofread and in accordance with scholarly and academic integrity standards. This report may address questions such as: What is sustainable tourism? What is sustainable development? How do these two phenomena relate to each other? What is overtourism and why does it occur? Brief highlighting of a few cases of overtourism. Are these cases of overtourism an indication that sustainable tourism efforts are a failure? Why or why not? What practices and policies might assist in addressing problems of overtourism? Are there places in Australia in danger of experiencing overtourism? Please explain this in some detail. Why is addressing overtourism important in planning for sustainable tourism? More detailed advice will be provided to assist you with this assignment on our learnonline site, during our tutorial sessions and through our discussion forum for this course. The report should be structured with: a title page that has a title for your report, your name and the course cohort to which you are enrolled; a brief but relevant introduction that overviews the focus of the report; a background section explaining the term overtourism and its origins; a discussion section addressing key, relevant issues and cases; an analysis section that applies course concepts to this topic and contains your critical analysis of this topic; a conclusion section which sums up the contents of the report; and a reference section that contains all resources used in the drafting of the report. Remember your key aim is to demonstrate your learning from your hard work and study in this course. This assignment offers you an opportunity to develop practical skills in communicating professionally on tourism policy and planning by analysing real world situations and developing analyses which are practical and applied. It is essential that you use the course resources (textbook, lectures and other reading materials – particularly the journal articles) to develop an informed and effective response to this request for an analysis. Additionally, you will need to undertake some additional research in order to identify the issues associated with overtourism. You are required to use course concepts as tools to develop your own insights and analysis which will demonstrate the attainment of analytical and critical thinking skills.
Hide

” Type of Document” It is a personal history statement There is no need to put any sources so change it from 1 to 0 Guidelines/ Instructions: “The Personal History Statement is required from all applicants. Please note that the Personal History Statement should not duplicate the Statement of Purpose. Please describe how your personal background and experiences influenced your decision to pursue a graduate degree. In this section, you may also include any relevant information on the following: How you have overcome barriers to access higher education How you have come to understand the barriers faced by others Your academic service to advance equitable access to higher education for women, racial minorities and individuals from other groups that have been historically underrepresented in higher education Your research focusing on under served populations or related issues of inequality Your leadership among such groups” Here is the significant link for the personal history statement : https://grad.berkeley.edu/admissions/apply/personal-statement/ Please make sure you read it carefully and closely.

Once you graduate and obtain your first job out of your Master of Social Work program, you may be asked to identify the gaps in services at your new agency. You may be asked to create a new group or help to identify a new evidence-based intervention that can be introduced to the clients. Understanding how to research the current literature, and then choose and evaluate an intervention, is an important component of being a successful social worker. For this course, you have researched new and interesting interventions that are currently being used with children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Further, you have explored the importance of connecting theory to practice. Assignment instruction For this Assignment, use will practice steps in Evidence-Based Practice. 1) You will think of a practice problem. 2) You then conduct a literature review on available research. 3) You will evaluate the evidence to determine which intervention to use. 4) You will consider client values and your clinical expertise. 5) You will think about what you hope the client gains from this intervention (i.e., decreased depression, increased quality of life, decreased PTSD symptoms) and consider how you might measure this change. To prepare: o Choose a population of interest to you. Children and Adolescents Choose a presenting problem (family conflict, and homelessness, etc.) related to the population of interest. My population is children and adolescents Conduct a literature review focused on the presenting problem within the population of interest. Assignment instruction continued Submit scholarly paper supported with a minimum of six peer-reviewed articles as references. In the paper, you should: Briefly describe the population and presenting problem you are focusing on for this assignment. Provide a review of the articles you reviewed from this project and explain what you learned from conducting this research. Briefly describe at least 2 evidence-based interventions currently used for your chosen population when addressing this particular problem. Provide supporting references when explaining the evidence behind the interventions. Explain which of these interventions you might choose to use and why. o Consider client values and your clinical expertise and how those might affect your decision of which intervention to use. Describe how you might apply the specific skills and techniques of the chosen intervention. Briefly explain how you could measure the outcomes of this intervention. Explain any cultural considerations that you need to take into account when working with this population or the particular presenting problem. Discuss how the Code of Ethics applies when working with this particular presenting problem and population. Explain how you would apply a trauma-informed lens when working with this population. Support your Final Project with specific references to the resources. Be sure to provide full APA citations for your references.

Please use the information presented in the course reading assignments to answer the questions and do not rely on outside sources. Please place your responses in a word document and save as last name, first initial (i.e. SmithJ), and post your document as an attachment in your assignment folder. Your document should be in essay format, error-free, graduate level composition (i.e. APA format should be followed, including cover sheet, abstract, citations and references). Please be sure to answer each question and cite the legal authority you are relying on to support your answer. PROBLEM: Paula recently began a new job as an executive assistant in a large corporation. She was assigned to work with David. Not long after she started work, David began to stop by her desk often, engaging her in long conversations about personal matters. Paula was alarmed by the situation, but said nothing. At the end of working hours one day, as all of their colleagues were heading home, David called Paula to into his office, told her to sit down, then began to tell her suggestive stories full of sexual innuendo. At one point, Paula got up to leave, but David moved between her and the door and said, No, sit down, I want you to hear this. Paula did so, thinking that she might get in trouble or lose her job if she did not do what her boss told her to do. David continued to talk for an hour before letting Paula leave. As she left his office, David patted her on the bottom and put his arms around her to hug her. Although she was very upset, Paula did not struggle or try to break free. Paula was so distressed by the incident that she did not go in to work the next morning. She telephoned Davids immediate superior, Anita, to complain about Davids behavior, and to ask for two weeks leave. The next evening, Paula received a telephone call from David, who said, What did you want to go and complain to Anita for? I was just being friendly just a friendly cuddle, thats all it was. And I tell you what, Ill carry on doing it as much as I want, so long as Im still your boss. Over the next few days, David made several more telephone calls to Paula, making comments to the same effect. Paula never returned to work for the corporation. She now wishes to sue David and the corporation. Based on the class reading assignments to date, please answer the following: 1. Name and define at least five torts that Paula can allege against David. Provide a detailed analysis of each tort. 2. Please identify Davids conduct for each tort. Provide a detailed analysis. 3. Name and define at least one tort claim that Paula can allege against the Corporation. 4. What type of damages, if any, can Paula recover?
Hide

The Critical Contribution is an analytical report on a set of arguments you find on a specific topic. Your goal is to explain and analyse these arguments, using the techniques specific to “logic” in a scholarly philosophical context e.g. fallacies, truth tables, premises, deductive and inductive logic etc. Choose one of the two topics: Killer Robots or Genetic Selection. Find two discussions relating to your topic. These discussions could appear in academic journals or in opinion pieces online or in print. The discussions must be written by named authors (rather than anonymously) and the must be published through a recognized public platform (i.e., a news site, rather than a personal blog). Your analysis must focus on at least one key argument within each of those two discussions. You can analyse more than two arguments if you like, but remember that your analysis should be as thorough as possible: analysing two arguments very carefully is better than analysing four or five arguments very briefly. The discussions could present opposing views (i.e., for and against) or they could present different arguments for the same view its up to you to decide which arguments to choose. Finalise the report as a single PDF document including (i) your 1000 word report, (ii) copies of the two discussions you have analysed. Possible topics for Genetic Selection: We’re Already Designing Babies (The Atlantic) You’re Only Human, But Your Kids Could Be So Much More (WIRED) Designer Babies: An Ethical Horror Waiting to Happen? (The Guardian) Why the Case Against Designer Babies Falls Apart (The Conversation) Dont edit the human germ line (Nature) Killer Robots: stopkillerrobots.org You can most certainly choose other discussions from journal articles or news sites, these are just to give you an idea/discussions to utilise.
Hide

Compare and contrast how immigration affects the United States with how immigration is affecting other nations. Also, compare and contrast how the United States is responding to immigration with ways other nations are responding to migration to their respective countries. How do deprivation theory and resource mobilization theory explain social movements?

Writing an Argument Sparky Here is the question you must riddle: WHAT are the best reasons why not to nuke the puppy Sparky? ANSWER THE QUESTION USING THIS USUAL FORMAT: >MLA heading-style, Size-12 Times New Roman Font Abstract (see Announcements) Documentation with citations and work cited Two sources (at least!!) Two to three pages DIRECTIONS: Read all the scenarios. Pick the TWO “best.” Argue for them using RESEARCH (Google) and argument form (The Cluster Form from the first week is easiest). In MLA-formatted essay, with works cited, support your position. Scenarios: You should not put Sparky in the microwave because . . . 1. It is unethical to torture a defenseless puppy for personal amusement. 2. Torturing animals will disgust your lover or spouse, and that lover or spouse will probably have nothing to do with you afterwards. 3. Microwaves radically elevate the temperature of biological liquids, including the fluids of the cardiovascular system and the inner-ear canal. 4. Cruelty to animals is a felony in Tennessee, and it could result in a five-to-ten-year prison sentence. 5. You might damage your expensive microwave. 6. You might damage my expensive microwave. 7. Sparky belongs to me. 8. You put the last one in the microwave, and it’s my turn now. 9. Huitzilopochtli, the Aztec god of war, forbids us to kill one of his holy avatars. 10. You will have to clean the microwave afterward. 11. Sparky is–gosh darn it–too cute for that! 12. Your suggestion that it will dry his coat and get rid of the “wet dog” smell is erroneous. 13. The strong always have an obligation to defend lesser creatures that are weak and helpless. 14. Burritos taste better than puppies when they are reheated. 15. All the food you cook in the microwave will taste like puppy hair afterwards. RUBRIC: > HEADING – your name my name Class (Phil 2306) Date (16 February 2019) Worth 10 points > ABSTRACT – lets me know your approach. Problem statement: What problem are you trying to solve? Motivation: Why do we care about the problem and the results? Approach: How did you go about solving or making progress on the problem Results: What’s the answer Conclusions: What are the implications of your answer? Worth 10 points > CITATIONS – All evidence must be MLA-format; example: (Smith 2) — after all info agreeing with works cited But just two or maybe three is too little, too lean and weak. Worth 10 points > SOURCES make sure that you do MLA format, otherwise illegal. Worth 20 point > REQUIREMENTS see assignment, look for particulars Worth 20 points > PERSUASION – backed by reasoning and evidence – facts, quotes, anecdotes Worth 40 points
Hide

1) Letter for Graduation: Your assignment is to write a letter to yourself on your graduation day. We will make sure it is delivered to you when you have completed your academic work at Chamberlain and are ready to receive your baccalaureate degree in nursing. a. Consider the following questions as you compose your letter. i. How do you hope you have changed in terms of knowledge and skills, and also personally? ii. What would you like to remind yourself about your inspiration for choosing this career? iii. You will be preparing to take the NCLEX exam and to start your first job as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse. Are there any words of encouragement that you would like to tell your future self? iv. Are there any words of caution you want to tell yourselfpitfalls to avoid? v. What kind of nurse do you hope you have become? What further growth and change do you envision for yourself?