Assignment, week 37: Right wing populism and radicalism in Europe Your task is to write a paper of 500-600 words, analyzing the following speeche. The aim is to give a characteristic of the right wing populism and/or radicalism that can be found in the speech, by relating the speech to the literature of this week.( literature of this week was Right wing populism and radicalism in Europe) Questions that can be helpful to answer to do this are for instance (you dont have to answer all questions, select the most relevant for the speech selected): – Is it populism, radicalism or both? What are your arguments for this interpretation? – What values are central in the speech? – How, if at all, are the values promoted in the speech related to interests? – What elements of radicalism or populism discussed in the literature are found in the speech? – What role do statements on reality play in the argument? – What roles do concept such as nation, nationalism, people, citizens, foreigners, politics, identity, values, ideology, liberalism, socialism, ethnicity, religion, culture play in the argument? – Is there an enemy, scape goat, threat identified? – What traits are there of a tension between national sovereignty and international cooperation? In order to pass, the text has to fulfill usual academic standards, be related to the course literature for this week and provide reasonable arguments for your interpretation/ characteristic. technical Aspects Your papper must be 100% free from plagiarism otherwise it will be an F grade. University use Urkund to detect any plaiarism so be aware of that. Your paper must be written in word format using Times New Roman 12 font and 1,5 spacing. Your paper must be professionally presented with thorough referencing, justified paragraphs and general neatness.(if needed) Your paper must contain appropriate in-text citations to any literature read or consulted in the Harvard style. (if needed) Your paper must include a proper reference list (in alphabetical order) at the end of the document.

Our knowledge and impressions of the U.S. Courts system have been greatly affected by the knowledge we have received from news outlets, media articles, television and word of mouth from our peers. In many instances we have received information that frivolous cases are regularly being filed in the courts. During Week 7 we will examine challenges modern courts are facing. One of the challenges we will read about in our text is the overburdening of court dockets. This can be caused by a lack of funding, lack of resources, lack of employees and/or judges, as well as the filing of frivolous cases. However, not all cases filed in the courts are frivolous. These modern challenges can also influence the public’s access to justice to seek remedy for wrongs encountered in many aspects of our lives. In further examination of these issues, we will watch the award winning documentary, Hot Coffee. It is a documentary about the McDonald’s coffee case, access to justice, tort reform and judicial elections. You may watch the movie for free here: https://tubitv.com/movies/310498/hot_coffee (Transcript for those in need of CC available here).You may also find the movie for free, to rent or purchase on various web sources, such as on Amazon Prime, iTunes, Hulu, Vudu, Netflix, Youtube, GooglePlay, HBOGo, etc. Like many movies, it rotates around on various streaming services, so be sure to check any you may have. Then, after watching the movie you will write a 3-4 page paper in which you must answer all of the below questions supported by further research.First, briefly summarize the movie. What were your thoughts on the movie?What is tort reform? Do you agree or disagree with tort reform? Does your home state have any types of tort reform enacted?What are some of the challenges a Plaintiff faces in filing a civil action for damages against a large corporation?What are the pros and cons of judicial elections? Are the judges in your home state appointed or elected? How does one become a state judge in your home state?You should conduct research and use academic sources to support your statements. Research should come from academic sources such as case law, statutes and law review articles in Nexis Uni, articles in the APUS Library (Summon), news paper articles, federal/state government websites, court websites, and academic studies containing statistics. You may also do research at your local library, museums or conduct interviews of those in the field of courts. Non-academic websites, such as Wikipedia or advertising blogs, such as Findlaw, may not be used.Formatting: Your paper is required to be double spaced in Times New Roman 12pt font, with 1” margins on each side. No title page is needed. Please place your name, student ID and date at the top of the paper. Citations should be in APA or Bluebook format. If you are a major in the Legal Studies Department, you are required to utilize Bluebook footnotes using the ‘insert footnote’ feature in Word. However, no reference list is needed. If you are a major that is not in the Legal Studies Department, you may use APA citations; however, you must include a reference list at the end of your paper.

Goal: Demonstrate understanding of three major theoretical approaches to personality development. 1. Identify key concepts including terms and definitions for each theory. 2. Identify key individuals associated with each theory. 3. Identify strengths and weaknesses of each theoretical position. Activities: 1. Read Chapters Five through Seven 2. Read the Illustrative Biographies of Mahatma Gandhi, Marilyn Monroe and Mother Teresa 3. Access two (2) Journal Articles from Wilmingtons Library using Psych ARTICLES 4. Visit website: https://www.simplypsychology.org/ 5. Answer the Activity Questions Activity Questions: 1. Compare/contrast the biographies how do their personalities fit the theorists they represent? Which of the biographies fit your own personality? Why? Give specific examples. 2. Locate one Journal Article for Horney and Allport from Wilmingtons Library using PsychARTICLES. In a paragraph (75 words or more), summarize their theories. How are they different? Which theory fits you? Why/why not? Be specific. 3. After visiting the website listed above (link to Erikson is on the right), summarize Eriksons theory. Choose another person (family or friend) besides yourself and explain the stage they are currently in according to Erikson. What milestones have they encountered? Be specific. 4. How has this assignment impacted you? What did you learn? Criteria for Response Paper: 1. Paper should be at least two full pages in length. This does not include any cover sheet or citation page you add. 2. Paper should be typed in Times New Roman, 12 point font, double spaced. 3. Paper and citation page should be written in full APA style. 4. Your response paper should be separate from this instruction sheet.
Hide

. You can describe what you do at your current job, or at a previous job if you do not currently work, or your day at school or home if you have never worked. You should write three paragraphs in total each describing the same situation, but you will tailor each different paragraph to a different audience. Your first paragraph will be tailored to the highly technical audience- your boss. He or she knows what you should be doing, so you can use shorthand, abbreviations, and generalizations that he or she would understand. The second paragraph will be tailored to the semi-technical audience; imagine this is someone who works in the same field as you, but not at the same place, so they sort of know what you should be doing, but not exactly. The last audience will be the lay person; this is someone who knows nothing about your field or what you do day to day.

1. From the translations of chapter 3 by Good and Alter, did you notice any significant differences? 2 .In a paragraph, approximately half a page (double-spaced), explain in your own words what Job is saying in his first extended speech. Then read Goods commentary on the chapter and add a few lines about how this changed or improved your understanding of the chapter. 3. Very briefly discuss any thematic or linguistic connections with the Prologue that you spot in chapter NB, it should be numbered the work as the above questions answered.

APA (strict) 6th edition level 1 and level 2 heading with part 1 part 2, etc No quotes 3 pages not including title page and reference page include a clear, separate introduction and conclusion References- will attach textbook pdf and article which will be course required material to reference and then two peer-reviewed Ethics and Issues in Contemporary Nursing Reference chapters 18, 19 and 20 Article Patient-Clinician Communication: Basic Principles and Applications Gluyas, H. (2015). Effective communication and teamwork promotes patient safety. Nursing Standard 29 (49), 50-57. Retrieved from https://journals.rcni.com/doi/pdfplus/10.7748/ns.29.49.50.e10042iminimum of four (4) total references: two (2) references from required course materials (will attach text book and article)) and two (2) peer-reviewed references (your choice). All references must be no older than five years Peer-reviewed references include references from professional data bases such as PubMed or CINHAL applicable to population and practice area, along with evidence based clinical practice guidelines. This assessment requires you address the following topics: See attached Rubric, pdf book and article Define the seven principles of patient- clinician communication Explain how you apply each of these to your interactions with your own patients Describe the three methods being used to improve interdisciplinary communication Choose the one that you think applies best to your own area of practice, or the one that your area of practice currently uses, and clearly describe how you use it. Explain the ethical principles that can be applied to issues in patient-clinician communication Explain the importance of ethics in communication and how patient safety is influenced by good or bad team communication
Hide

ALL OF THE FOLLOWING (six items) MUST BE ADDRESSED FOR EACH OF THE FOUR APN ROLES (certified nurse practitioner (CNP), clinical nurse specialist (CNS), Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist, and Certified Nurse-Midwife (CNM). Provide a minimum of 2 current scholarly references 1. work environment 2. level of accountability 3. patient population 4. salary 5. scope of practice 6. Provide A Pro and Con list for contemplation of choosing which role to choose to obtain professionally and provide appropriate citations.?

Answer the following question in essay form (double-spaced, APA format) of 2 pages: following Week 2 templateto write the paper!!! a) Lawler advises paying the individual instead of the job, and asserts that pay for performance should focus on collective performance more than individual performance. Do you agree or disagree? State your position and have academic sources in support. Lawler, E.E. (2000). Rewarding excellence. Pay strategies for the new century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. You will need at least four peer-reviewed sources to support your claims.

Search the web for an informative site about one of the chromosome abnormality disorders OR the effects of one teratogen (Chapter 2 Teratogens for examples). Write in detail about ONLY ONE specific teratogen or chromosome abnormality. It would also be interesting if you can find info about a chromosome abnormality or teratogen that is not mentioned in the text. (If you use wikipedia as one of your sources, you must corroborate the information with at least one additional source.Wikipedia by itself is not an acceptable site)2. Summarize IN YOUR OWN WORDS what you learned about your chosen topic and cite your research sources (web address, journal article, book, etc.) at the bottom of your response. For full credit, your summary should be at least 200 words in readable, essay-quality English (no texting or tweeting here, please!).

Choose one case discussed in Chapters 1, 2, 7, 8, or 9 (material from weeks 1-2). Your paper should be titled with the name of the case and its full citation, and the page on which it is found in the text. Identify the relevant facts of the case, the issues presented, and applicable law; then discuss the courts ruling and the main point that this case illustrates. Indicate whether you agree or disagree with the decision, and why. Cite your text and other sources/cases that support or contradict the courts decision. You must look up the full text of the case in our library’s LexisNexis Academic database. Identify key facts determinative to the courts decision and describe a fact pattern that might lead to a different outcome. This paper should be at least 800 words in length. See also the Paper 1 & 2 Grading Criteria. Do not duplicate a classmate’s case choice. Deliverables: Share a complete draft of your paper with classmates in the Paper 1 Discussion topic and also provide feedback on their work. Feedback may be utilized to edit your draft. Post your finalized paper to the Paper 1 Dropbox of the course. Paper 1 & 2 Grading Criteria The following table reflects how your Papers for this course will be graded. For assignment details see their respective Dropboxes in the course. These papers should be a minimum of 800 words (in the body, excluding title, citations, etc.) Not sure how to cite sources? See the Legal Citation page of this course’s Library Resource Guide. Give the full citation for your case, the page in our text on which it is found, and look up the full text of the case on, e.g., LexisNexis in our library. Paper 1 & 2 Grading Criteria Criteria Description Points Content The essay develops a central point, idea, or thesis that is clearly defined and supported by concrete, substantial, and relevant evidence. 40 Organization The essay is organized in paragraphs that are unified, coherent, and effective, with transitions between ideas. The sentences are correctly constructed, logical, and complete. 15 Diction & Mechanics The essay uses appropriate word choices; uses standard grammar, punctuation, and spelling. 10 References Paper uses internal citations; includes at least 1 non-text source; sources are reliable; legal citations are properly formatted in BlueBook style. Non-legal citations may be in either APA or MLA style. (Your textbook is an acceptable source.) 15 Total 80 Textbook: Legal Aspects of Health Care Administration, 13th Edition – 180 Day Option ISBN: 9781284166828 By: George D. Pozgar
Hide